![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris Norris" wrote in message ... Peripheral vision? If you had persistently relied upon peripheral vision for situation awareness at a military flying school you would have been a candidate for elimination. You would have been taught to "keep your head out of the cockpit and on a swivel." In other words, during contact flight, your instructor would want to see your head up and in constant motion, traversing a very wide angle . You would be taught to cross check instruments quickly and return to the routine of turning your head so that you could see directly your situation. Good peripheral vision would be a requirement for your acceptance in the program, but you would not make the grade relying on it as you suggest. Thank you for your candid opinions on my flying ability. Yeah, I remember you sitting in the back watching my every move during the lessons. For your information I value my life and so the instructor did not have to tell me to look around regularly and before manoevring. Good for you. Do you really imagine I sat there and only looked at the panel and through the front windshield, with my head fixed and eyes forward like a freakin crash test dummy or something? I know that this will be hard for you to take and I really don't want to upset you, but the fact is, you have not been uppermost in my mind. Moreover, I hadn't so much as imagined your existance till now and am having difficulty with the concept at present. In general, however, the behavior you mention is typical of new student pilots. I think a lot of people can tell the difference between sitting at a computer desk and sitting in a cockpit. I know I can and I'm starting to wonder if you cannot and therefore are taking it out on the fine people in this group? Good for you. Thinking and wondering should help you to sort it all out. Anyway, this whole discussion wasn't about just turning one's head. It was about using FS as a training aid. For instance you can read a mutlitude of books on navigation but putting theory into practice and using the instruments and charts for real is a different ball game and requires hours of practice. All I'm saying is that as a training aid FS is a valuble addition to ground school and you can practice whenever you like. Chris Norris Apparently, you have not bothered to read the entire thread. Do that and a little more thinking and wondering. Kalijaa |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |