![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is no simple answer to comparative safety of gliding and driving,
and few statistics that I am aware of to make a numerical comparison. Among the bases of comparison one might try are fatalities per event (launch vs car journey), per unit of time spent doing it, and/or per person doing it, but data for any two equivalents are hard to come by. One very crude measure is say 24 million drivers ( a guess - use your own figure if you think that's wrong) in the UK kill about 4000 people a year (which includes passengers and other road users) - say 1 per 6,000 drivers. Gliding has less than 10,000 pilots (an overstatement because not all are P1 each year) and we have about 5 fatalities (nearly all being participants) each year - say 1 per 2,000. So this method of counting gets at least 3 times the risk. Increasing driver/passenger numbers and reducing the number of active pilots would worsen the ratio. On the other hand, people exposed to gliding risk each year could include all 30,000 temporary members (most having one or two air experience trial lessons), just as car fatalities include passengers. Redo the sums accordingly if that helps. People at risk from gliding include those on the ground. Although such fatalities are very rare, they are not unknown - I knew one person who was killed by a cable snapping back when released from a tow truck, and I know of one woman killed on a public footpath by a glider landing next to it. One could add in the friends, families and hangers on at gliding sites to increase the base and so reduce the incidence rate. These latter refinements bring in more people "at risk" but at a much lower real level of risk than somebody who is in the cockpit many times in a year. But then, the car fatalities include people who are drivers, and also those who are front seat passengers and rear seat passengers - the latter generally being at much lower risk if they are strapped in. Once you start trying to refine the risk levels, there is no end - competition and aerobatic pilots are probably generally more at risk than careful local-only pilots, but stupid local-only pilots who mishandle cable breaks are very much at risk. The two risks I know of where you cannot personally reduce the level to zero by your own efforts - airframe integrity, and collision from the blind spots - are among the lowest of all incident levels. So we are left with most of the risk being in our own hands - the nut behind the stick is the biggest risk factor. Chris N. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
FAR:Safety Pilot & High Performance/Complex? | Jim | General Aviation | 51 | August 18th 03 03:08 PM |
FAR:Safety Pilot & High Performance/Complex? | Jim | Piloting | 10 | August 13th 03 08:51 PM |