![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This was after his pointed briefing on the ground about that we needed
to be clear about who was in control, and that whoever was would announce / confirm it. Mike Not to condone this behavior as I agree that only one should be flying unless a demonstration is in progress, may I offer a possible rationale for it? Frequently a CFIG may be flying for the first time with a pilot and until an assessment of skill is completed, the instructor is protecting his assets until a safe altitude/airspeed/position is attained. My first few students in the glider suffered from my own ham-hand until I became more confident in my own ability. Now, I place my index finger lightly on top of the stick as I know where I want the ship to go and as I feel the student input, I am able to relax. In the Schweizer 2-33, my feet simply must be on the rudder pedals due to the small rear cockpit and my long legs. I address this with my students by telling them to push until I get the message and move. During my check-out as a club instructor at a large US club, my check-instructor was riding the controls in a Grob throughout our flight. This gentlemen did not know me or my qualifications except that I was to be a new instructor for the club, yet I was insulted in his actions. At that point, I firmly decided that if I required a demonstration of a manuever, I would tell the student and have him join me on the controls. Otherwise, I would only use my voice and allow the student to fly, using me as expensive life insurance. At the large club, there was also a concern that an instructor with a lower flight time to flight number ratio would result in short flights for the new club members. This was seen as a detriment due to the typical first come, first fly procedure in effect there. Club policy promoted instuctors helping the student to stay aloft for the allowed time. This increases student total time, but I maintain that it affects his own confidence in his ability to remain aloft. We all need to fall out of lift and find it again. While there may be many other reasons for this type of instructional technique, these are the most likely. As a student you are the boss, even in a club. If your instructor is retarding your learning--get another instructor--now. Terry Claussen CFIG Estrella Sailport, AZ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|