![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You have proved my point by having to use an example of a climb that is cut
off due to cloudbase, and by assuming that the next thermal is in an entirely different airmass with very weak lift. In the more general case (the one we normally talk about), you are going to try to match the climb rate at the top of the current thermal with the climb rate at the bottom of the next one. That matching exercise will depend on the nature of both the current thermal and the next one. So the cruise speed depends on the nature of both thermals. Neither is more important than the other in determining cruise speed. "Todd Pattist" wrote in message ... "Greg Arnold" wrote: Don't you want your climb rate at the top of the current thermal to equal your expected climb rate at the bottom of the next thermal, and won't those climb rates determine your speed between the thermals? Yes, but the climb rate in this thermal only affects when you leave it, not how fast you cruise, while the climb rate in the next thermal controls how fast you cruise. If you hit cloudbase while climbing at 10 knots, but can only get to the bottom of a 2 knot thermal, then you fly M=2 to that 2-knotter, not M=10. Todd Pattist - "WH" Ventus C (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reno Air Races -- 2600 Miles in 2 Days! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 88 | September 25th 04 03:48 PM |
Crossing the Rocky Mountains | RD | Piloting | 16 | January 9th 04 09:15 PM |
Across Nevada and Part Way Back (long) | Marry Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 18 | July 30th 03 08:52 PM |