![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flying head down is never necessary. The center of the finish cylinder is
almost always close to some visible marker on the airport. If it isn't, I ask the CD to move it so it is. My software beeps when I cross the boundary of the cylinder, does yours? Finally, I only glance at the computer once in a while to see if I'm falling below glide slope, which I'd also be doing with a 50 foot gate. But then again, I'm not anal about finishing at precisely 500 feet... I don't agree. When you approach a cylinder, you are aiming at its center. I haven't seen a computer program that optimizes the point on the cycliner you should be aiming at given current position and altitude and interpolates your desired finish height to that point. Instead you are looking down as the distance clicks off, and checking your altitude to make sure that you don't fall slightly short. As noted in earlier threads this means more heads down and more variations in traffic height and speed, all converging on a much smaller area (the optimum point on the cylinder). Finish lines are almost completely heads up. If you can't judge 50 feet looking out the window, you have problems... certainly becuase your altimeter is showing a variation of 50 feet or more since you set it at takeoff. Additionally, traffic speed is much closer to uniform. Low, slow gliders land straight ahead rather than obstructing the finish line. And I've yet to encounter a glider at my height circling 1 mile from a finish line. 91.119 Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes... My high speed finish is typically the crosswind or downwind leg of my pattern. I have, on several occasions, thermalled away from a high speed pass (never at a contest). There you have an argument. Otherwise I'm excercising my options as a pilot to conform to a standard pattern... one established by contestants prior to the contest. I am therefore within the requirements of 91.119. Be careful when citing book and passage from the FARs. I know for a fact that you don't follow some rules (none of us do) as scrupulously as you are applying them in this case. I can find some gray in 91.119. You'll be hard pressed to find any in 91.155. Virtue: the behavior we demand of others, but excuse the lack of in ourselves. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. | Doug | Instrument Flight Rules | 70 | January 11th 04 08:35 PM |
Jet fighter top speed at military power | David L. Pulver | Military Aviation | 18 | December 1st 03 07:13 PM |
Angle of climb at Vx and glide angle when "overweight": five questions | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 16 | November 29th 03 10:01 PM |
New Film: The Need For Speed - Going to war on drugs | Phil Carpenter | Military Aviation | 0 | July 23rd 03 07:43 AM |