A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

DuoDiscus Wing



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old October 17th 03, 08:10 AM
Slingsby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The big advantage of that method is that the sandwich skins are more
stable, and less prone to mirroring the spar after aging. One of the
disadvantages is that the spar is less stiff than it would be if it
went from outer skin to outer skin, and didn't have its depth reduced
by the sandwich foam.


I don't think this is a disadvantage, but is instead an advantage,
because the wing isn't so stiff, and the pilot enjoys a smoother ride
in turbulence. The disadvantage is it likely takes more material, so
the wing is a bit heavier and more expensive.

************************************************** ********************************
I don't know Eric, that flexibility and smoother ride might be your
upper spar cap lifting off of the shear web. There is no law which
says the wing has to actually snap. It could be more benign; one wing
a little more flexible than the other or air brakes popping open
during high speed runs in turbulence. Each 4g pop might add another
..010" to the delamination between those two air bubbles in the bonding
paste.

The stiffness, or lack thereof, can still be designed into the wing by
varying the amount of carbon fibre rovings in the spar cap, or
Graphlite rods in the case of the Genesis 2 and LAK 17. I believe the
LAK 17 wing has the externally made spar bonded to the outer skin of
the wing because the designers wanted an extremely thin profile. The
spar is only 3 1/2 inches deep at the wing root of the LAK 17; bonding
it to the outer skin of the wing allows the wing to be extremely thin.
Unfortunately, some of the earlier 17's had that mirroring and the
factory paid to have the wings re-profiled. I believe that happened
to some of the earlier ASW 28 gliders, too. Still, the use of
Graphlite rods instead of carbon fibre rovings, and externally built
spars which are then wrapped in fibreglass cloth and vacuum-bagged is
a method which produces stronger, more durable and longer lasting
wings. As the current fleet of German gliders gets older I'll wager
there will be a lot of speed limiting directives because the "margin
of error" isn't what they thought it would be.
What kind of spar construction methods do the SparrowHawk, Apis and
Russia gliders use?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ANG Woman Wing Commander Doesn't See Herself as Pioneer, By Master Sgt. Bob Haskell Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 March 18th 04 08:40 PM
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping Wright1902Glider Home Built 0 September 29th 03 03:40 PM
Can someone explain wing loading? Frederick Wilson Home Built 4 September 10th 03 02:33 AM
An Affordable Homebrue 60 in DS machine Grant Soaring 0 August 8th 03 03:52 AM
Wing Extensions Jay Home Built 22 July 27th 03 12:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.