![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As long as we're sitting around the campfire and also to show you I can
go both ways, I 'member a time only a couple of years ago that I experienced the dreaded aerotow line break at 200 ft and 60 kt over the outbound fence. I looked out front and it wasn't too exiting, so I gingerly turned ninety to the left and the scenery looked some better, but not the greatest, so I REALlY gingerly gave it another ninety to the left and was really impressed this time as I found I was perfectly lined up with the takeoff runway. And I recall I hadn't lost too much of my original 60 kt. Will wonders never cease!! I thought "OK now God, you've made it possible for me to do this little magic trick perfectly the first time I tried it in front of all my friends and hangar bums, give me your hand again and let's try just one more." So I pulled spoilers, checked gear down and rolled up to my exact takeoff spot. And as I popped the canopy, my good friend who shall remain nameless, said "S--t!, you've gone and lost us another Tost ring, somebody go back to the hangar and see if they can find another tow rope". It was his turn to tow, so I pushed back. Nobody else said a word. Safety lecture from a dummy follows: I don't remember to this day why I ninetied to the left. During the previous year's biannual when Juan Batch pulled the plug on me over his outbound fence, turning right was the correct choice because in that direction lay the wind, which blows one back over the airport. This improves the scenery like you wouldn't believe. When I tried the trick for real solo, the wind lay to my left. I'd like to think it was instinct. But I believe it was a coin toss. Anyway, thank God. And Juan. It Depends BJ Bob Johnson wrote: Hi Bill -- I 'member my O-Nine Two oil field piano wire breaking at the half way point during a tow in Roy Schlemeyer's old SGS 2-22. I yelled "Oh, line break" or something to that effect and recall the glider innards debris collected since the last ice age floating up and dancing before my eyes as I dumped the stick full forward. Was it half a second before I reacted? Can't believe I waited that long. And when the astronauts tell you that zero-g is exhilarating, believe it. Luckily, I had been well briefed by Roy as to what to expect. It has been theorized that some people are "allergic" to zero-g and they instinctively jerk the stick full back instead of push full forward. Unfortunately, this is the last mistake they ever make and we can no longer interview them as to why they did this. There, we're back to the original question, "Is winch launch safer than aerotow?" The answer? -- scroll down IT DEPENDS! Thanks and good to hear from you again. BJ Bill Daniels wrote: "Bob Johnson" wrote in message ... Eggert -- Those are really good numbers for your winch. With V8 300 HP (GMC 454 c.i., 7.4 L), and 5000 ft (1550 m) Plasma line laid out, we are getting the rule of thumb 1/3 cable length releases of 1700 ft (525 m). This is into 10-15 kt wind. Much over that, we leave the Blanik in the barn! BJ Midland, Texas Bob, When winching, the wind is your friend. Quitting at 15 knots is not necessary. I have winched into 35 knots and higher winds and the results are spectacular. Each 10 knots of headwind is the equivalent of about 40 additional HP. The thing that often severely limits the altitude gained is a slow pitch-up profile at the start of the launch. The final height achieved is largely determined by the profile flown in the first few seconds of the launch. Now, as everyone has pointed out, you need to be careful here. Safety at the start of the climb is a combination of airspeed, altitude and attitude. The more you have of the first, the faster you can get the second two and the higher you will get. I've done calculations, simulator runs (X-Plane) and flight test to prove the following point. If you have 60 knots in a glider with a stalling airspeed of 40 knots, you can be in full climb attitude at zero altitude and still have a large safety margin. Practice this way - at several thousand feet AGL, zoom the glider into a 50 degree nose-up attitude. As the airspeed decays to 60 knots, yell "WIRE BREAK", delay 0.5 seconds (simulating reaction time) and pitch forward at zero G. Watch the airspeed and altitude, you'll see what I mean. (For winch CFI-G's, this is a great way to teach how to handle wire breaks.) If you have (or simulate) a wire break at this point and start a zero G pitch over after a .5 second delay, the minimum airspeed during the parabolic ballistic trajectory will be about 50 - 55 knots when the glider reaches apogee at an altitude of about 100 feet AGL. So there you are at 100 feet and 55 knots in a normal gliding attitude - not exactly a problematic situation, just land straight ahead. The reason this works is that the glider's induced drag at zero G is minimal so the airspeed decay is mainly just due to gravity and the glider follows a parabolic trajectory until the pilot re-establishes one G at the normal glide attitude. I need to repeat that I am not advocating a rocket blast-off kind of climb profile but a smooth transition into the full climb without undue delay equipped with a full understanding of the safety margins. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
using winch instead of aerotow | goneill | Soaring | 5 | August 27th 03 02:46 PM |