![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Indeed, aerotow can sometimes be interesting! Some years ago I was flying in
a local club competition and found myself behind an underpowered Rallye, piloted by a man with a recently diagnosed heart condition who therefore needed a safety pilot with him. (Yes, I know the correct response is to refuse the tow, but competitions soften the safety cells in the brain, even local club competitions). We climbed (very slowly) to 400ft and then stayed there while we flew in a straight line at least 3 miles from the airfield. It's the only time I've been field spotting on tow for such a long time. Not suprisingly, I failed to soar once we reached the release height of 2,000 ft (partly because I only had time for once centreing turn if I was to remain within gliding range of the field). My relight was a winch launch! "Bill Daniels" wrote in message ink.net... "Chris OCallaghan" wrote in message om... A related remembrance... Years ago I attended a mid-summer's eve cookout at Ridge Soaring in central PA. For entertainment we were armchairing the end o'day training flights. A glider released just after take-off, landing at the far end of the field. The tow plane landed, then taxied down to launch the glider in the opposite direction. As the tug passed us, 2-33 in tow, KS asked what was going on. I explained that a series of rope breaks were practiced as a student got close to solo. They had just completed a straight ahead release and recovery and would now practice a 180 for return to the runway. As the tow plane and glider reached 20 feet above the ground, still short of the runway boundary, Karl said, "Now! It would be hairy, but you could do it." Karl and a handfull of other pilots probably could. The rest of us wait until we have enough altitude to more than measure the sins we're likely to commit as the emergency unfolds -- 200 feet being an appropriate indulgence. For those who need to know to the inch, don't forget to include 35% of your wingspan, lest you bury a tip. And don't forget that anytime the controls are not neutral, your sink rate goes well below the arc of the polar. So far, of the math I've seen, success would only be achieved for gliders of zero span requiring no control input (and resulting drag) to initiate a bank or roll out of it. Not to belabor the obvious, but a 180 return to the runway from a 200 foot airtow rope break is not always possible. We tend to talk as if it were true but if believe it, we may be setting up a disaster. With a heavy glider, weak tug, high density altitude and unfavorable wind (and maybe a thick headed tug pilot) you may need as much as 1000 feet to be in a position for a safe return to the airfield. There have been many occasions when my left hand hovered near the release in preparation for a simulated rope break. But, looking back over my shoulder at the airfield, I thought, "I don't theeenk so" and let the student continue. Over the last year a young friend of mine (A CFI-G) suffered two low altitude rope breaks (weak link failures) and each incident resulted in an off-airfield landing. (To his credit - no damage) Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
using winch instead of aerotow | goneill | Soaring | 5 | August 27th 03 02:46 PM |