![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, JJ was one of my two instructors at Dunstable 40 years ago (John
Jeffries, not to be confused with some young whippersnapper from Nevada who has hijacked these initials). I remember the way he used to fly, and it is obvious that some things don't change. My other instructor was Mike Till, I flew with him mostly, I see he is on the current roster. As to launch failures generally, aerotow failures will often involve outlandings, fortunately such failures are rare compared with wire launch failures. There has been considerable discussion as to how aerotow failures should be taught, since it is important that the pupil should not assume that the airfield can always be reached. It maybe that JJ could get back, but this does not mean that you can when it happens for real. Instructors are apt to pull a simulated failure when it is still possible to get back, though only just with JJ. There is a lot to be said for using a motor-glider for teaching aerotow landing options, though JJ won't like this idea! In real life some aerotow operations are carried out where an aerotow failure may result at best in a controlled crash. Remember that if the tug has an engine problem it may operate at low power before failing, so you will be slower and lower than on a normal tow before you abandon the tow or it abandons you. As to wire launch failures at Dunstable, yes there is often a very narrow gap between being too low to turn and too high to get in straight ahead. It is certainly a good idea to have fields outside the airfield in mind when reviewing the options while doing the launch failure bit of "eventualities" before starting the launch. Often the field is partly blocked by gliders awaiting retrieve, and tractors on their way to do the retrieve. If you do not think of an option when reviewing options before starting, you are unlikely to think of it when conducting a very high pressure recovery which is by definition not expected (though it must be thought about). W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.). Remove "ic" to reply. "Stephen Haley" wrote in message ... I still fly at Dunstable and can say that there can still be a problem on very still days off the winch where you have too much height to land straight ahead but not enough to turn safely. This is especially true for abinitios/early solos. Unfortunately Dunstable is still far from flat and still has a horrendous dip to the downs side over half the field with the other half having being filled in with spoil from the M1 making diagonal landings in that direction difficult/impossible unless you want to do a lemming act off the cliff edge that bisects part of the field but at least the hedge has been partially removed on part of the southern edge leaving the option of running on into a ploughed field. While I have never seen an outfield landing following a winch break I could see it happening a calm days with certain glider types. Aerotowing in strong easterly winds out towards the downs - that is best confined to the horror vault. The wind coming across the top of the downs produces a very violent wave pattern across the field and just as you are getting to the roughest part where it feels like the wind is almost vertical and trying to slam you back into the field the tug has to execute a sharp right turn at v low altitude. There are parts of the field where the wave effect produces a complete wind shadow. As for being pulled off at 200ft - I wish. One of JJs (who probably taught the previous poster) last acts before retiring for the winter was to pull me off over the sw hedge - luckily we have a dip a bit further on that gives another 40 ft and somehow I got it down back on the field after a 270. When I asked him later if it was circa 150ft I was given the laconic comment - "Not as much as that - remember each wing is only 30ft so you dont need a lot providing you remember you already have flying speed and fly the turn precisely". I never did have the courage to ask him exactly how high we were. "W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.)." wrote in message ... Not always. I learnt to fly at the London Gliding Club, Dunstable Downs some 40 years ago, entirely on the winch, and on the T21b. There was one run for which I was taught that the correct procedure for a launch failure at a certain height was to land beyond the airfield boundary in the farmer's field. The point surely is that before the launch starts the pilot should have in mind all the possible options to cope with any launch failure; this may include an off-airfield landing for either a wire or an aerotow launch. Incidentally, the London Club now has more land, and outlandings after a winch launch failure are not now required. W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.). "Bill Daniels" wrote in message nk.net... snip My original point was that with airtow stuff happens and sometimes you aren't in position for a return to the runway. In winch launching, you are. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
using winch instead of aerotow | goneill | Soaring | 5 | August 27th 03 02:46 PM |