![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark, I'm checking with a FT. Worth FSS specialist on the published
requirement. I'm also going through the SFAR's to find the guidelines. I do know that AC(advisory circular) 99-1C addressed just exactly what happened to us post 9-11, with regard to procedures. We are required to "guard" an ATC or FSS frequency. It does not state specifically 121.5, but that would be the natural choice. We were thirty minutes out of EWR, when we were turned away that morning. We chose Parkersburg West VA. as our get out of the sky point. Three days later when we were let back in the system, one of the requirements was to monitor 121.5. We received this from the NBAA (national business aircraft association). I was led to believe early in my career that if you have a #2 radio then it should be on 121.5, and you should monitor it, in case we do something stupid like, accidently turn down the volume on our #1 radio,or miss a frequency change. Then ATC can contact you on 121.5 which is always standing "guard". This is also where we would hear the glider pilot making a distress call, or asking for a relay back to "Hobbs Air" or whatever. If we aren't monitoring then we miss a chance to assist a fellow pilot in trouble. Switch places with the guy in trouble. Wouldn't you want him to be monitoring 121.5, while sipping on his coffee, in his air conditioned jet. I can't believe, oh yes I can, that there are crews out there not monitoring, especially with the on going threat of a missle up the hind quarters, if we do something wrong. I'd hate to go on the chief pilots carpet, after being intercepted by an F-16, and tell him that I didn't know I was suppose to be monitoring 121.5, which is where ATC was trying to give me a simple frequency change. Ouch!! (MKEENE221) wrote in message ... From my experience, I can say that all commercial flights do not monitor 121.5, but enough of them do that a downed or stranded aircraft would have a good chance of contacting one. By the way, did the FAA lift the requirement for monitoring 121.5? If they did, I don't recall seeing it. Even now, on 121.5, I still hear ATC calling aircraft with whom they've lost communications and to warn aircraft about possible airspace incursions . Mark |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Laser beams being aimed at airliners? | Corky Scott | Piloting | 101 | January 22nd 05 08:55 AM |
PIREPS / airliners | [email protected] | Piloting | 10 | January 21st 05 11:15 PM |
2 civilian airliners down south of Moscow | Pete | Military Aviation | 64 | September 11th 04 04:16 PM |
121.5 MHz ELT's (was Breitling Watch) | EDR | Piloting | 1 | August 21st 03 05:41 AM |
This explains the lambswool seat covers in Airliners | StellaStar | Piloting | 1 | July 10th 03 04:17 PM |