![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Eric Greenwell wrote: Wallace Berry wrote: So, I'd have to say that all the bad things I've been told about landing flaps on gliders and V-tails are definitely untrue with respect to the HP-16. If you believe that, perhaps you haven't been told "all the bad things". For example, I've had HP pilots tell me getting sucked up into a cloud can be "awkward" to deal with when all you've got is flaps. My first and only flight in an HP went like Mr. Berry's; even so, I hope anyone beginning to fly a flaps only glider gets thorough checkout, because there are ways to go wrong. No doubt there are ways to go wrong, but every design has it's quirks. I would sooner turn a low time pilot loose in that HP-16 than my 301 Libelle. For sure my one experience in a landing flapped equipped bird is far too little experience to generalize. That's why I limited my comments to the HP-16. However, I have been told horror stories about V-tails and landing flaps. You know the stories. I was told the V-tail HP's were hard to fly and dangerous for any but the most experienced fliers. I'm no ace but I thought the thing was very easy to fly. Maybe the other HP's are different. The main myth is that you can't modulate the flaps to control glide path. In the HP-16, I rolled the flaps on and off within a fairly wide range and the glider behaved very much like a glider with very effective divebrakes. I would be very comfortable landing Jim's HP-16 in any reasonably landable field. Deploying flaps at high speeds can be problematic in a number of ships. I have heard that at least one 301 Libelle structural failure was due to flap deployment at a speed significantly above Vne. However, a number of ships which have flaps that deploy with the divebrakes have maximum deployment speed limitations too. And, not to forget, deployment of just divebrakes at high speeds can be dangerous. I think a couple of open class ships have lost their wings when the divebrakes were deployed well over Vne. As for getting sucked into a cloud, I would have an easier time keeping that HP-16 out of the cloud than my Libelle with it's relatively ineffective divebrakes. I have been in the gear down, full divebrakes and full slip configuration diving for the edge of the cloud at high speed to keep from getting sucked in. Fly safe, Wallace |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
f-84G Flaps question | Frederico Afonso | Military Aviation | 0 | September 8th 04 05:58 PM |
757 flaps miss-aligned in cruise | AnyBody43 | General Aviation | 1 | April 2nd 04 01:01 AM |
Cessna 182S flaps | EDR | Piloting | 7 | January 16th 04 02:37 AM |
Slats and Fowler Flaps On Light Plane | Brock | Home Built | 28 | July 31st 03 10:12 PM |
automatic flaps problem in Beechcraft KAF90 | deeknow | Simulators | 0 | July 24th 03 02:45 AM |