A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aft CG limit(s)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old November 24th 03, 06:53 PM
Judy Ruprecht
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

At 03:24 24 November 2003, Andy Durbin wrote:

The (ASW 28) flight manual also shows the flight mass
vs CG envelope in
graphical form on page 5.10. It shows the aft cg limit
constant at
345mm from 300kg to about 380kg. Note that 380kg is
the maximum
allowed flight mass without water ballast. The aft
limit then slopes
forward to about 315mm at 525kg.


There is also a small forward
movement of the forward cg limit as flight mass increases.


Somewhere tucked into the text of the manual, there
must be some passing reference to using this graph!

Just guesswork on my part: (1) a forward-leaning aft
CG limit line may reflect the flight CG of the glider
shifting forward with the addition of water in the
wing tanks, while (2) this shift is partially offset
by carrying water in a tail tank, and (3) this balancing
act is also reflected in the forward-leaning forward
CG limit line. (It seems to me your graph *must* contemplate
a tail tank... ballasting the wing tanks alone would
cause a forward shift in the flight CG, NOT a forward
shift in the forward CG *limit* - only the addition
of weight well aft could do that!)

In all cases, of course, (1) the unballasted minimum
seat weight must be met (otherwise, the pilot who
dumps water ballast will zip out the aft end of the
flight envelope. Not pretty.) and (2) no flying weight
may exceed maximum gross weight (I assume, as in the
good old/bad old days, that few pilots can actually
fly with full ballast... they'll bump into max gross
first.)

If my guesswork is correct, the next logical questions
about the graph are (1) what assumptions are made about
ballast distribution in wing and tail tanks and (2)
as a practical matter, what glider systems & pilot
procedures assure this distribution.

Not helping much, am I?

Judy


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sounds barrier speed limits Roger Halstead Piloting 2 August 10th 04 02:09 PM
Buying an L-2 Robert M. Gary Piloting 13 May 25th 04 04:03 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 May 1st 04 08:27 AM
Cirrus Airframe Life Limits Dave Owning 16 April 27th 04 05:58 PM
Cirrus Airframe Life Limits Dave Piloting 16 April 27th 04 05:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.