|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
November 25th 03, 10:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
X-no-archive: yes
In article hFPwb.225716$mZ5.1710772@attbi_s54, Ivan Kahn writes I agree, why traces are needed is really the point. But I believe a GPS with WAAS is far more accurate than a barograph and should also be more cost effective. But unless someone seeks approval then I would not expect any specification to change. I was just wondering if there is any movement in this area. Ivan I don't think it happens quite that way. If you submit a recorder that does not conform the Specification in Force at the time, approval will not be granted until it DOES conform. The specification would need to be changed FIRST. I do not believe that the requirement for Barometric Altitude will be removed any time soon. Best regards, Tim Newport-Peace "Indecision is the Key to Flexibility." 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WAAS and Garmin 430/530 | DoodyButch | Owning | 23 | October 13th 03 04:06 AM |
| Updated IGC approval documents for Cambridge GNSS flight recorders | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | August 27th 03 05:28 PM |
| Terminology of New WAAS, VNAV, LPV approach types | Tarver Engineering | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | August 5th 03 03:50 AM |
| WAAS | Big John | Piloting | 8 | July 22nd 03 01:06 PM |
| Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |
Threaded Mode