|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#12
November 26th 03, 10:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 22:37:33 +0000, Tim Newport-Peace
] wrote: I don't think it happens quite that way. If you submit a recorder that does not conform the Specification in Force at the time, approval will not be granted until it DOES conform. The specification would need to be changed FIRST. As opposed to NOT approving a recorder which does meet the specification at the time and then changing the specification later? Which GFAC has done. I do not believe that the requirement for Barometric Altitude will be removed any time soon. I agree, that would be far too sensible a decision for IGC/GFAC to make. Mike Borgelt 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WAAS and Garmin 430/530 | DoodyButch | Owning | 23 | October 13th 03 04:06 AM |
| Updated IGC approval documents for Cambridge GNSS flight recorders | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | August 27th 03 05:28 PM |
| Terminology of New WAAS, VNAV, LPV approach types | Tarver Engineering | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | August 5th 03 03:50 AM |
| WAAS | Big John | Piloting | 8 | July 22nd 03 01:06 PM |
| Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |
Threaded Mode