![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... Mark James Boyd wrote: Eric Greenwell wrote: Mark James Boyd wrote: At 500 lbs, a notional Sparrowhawk with two AMT-450s would accelerate at .12 g's (2 knots/second), to 40 knots in 20 seconds using 1200 feet of runway. Assuming wheel friction and drag make this figure double, under 2400 feet of runway is still respectable. Wouldn't that be (500/(45+45) = 0.18 g's ? Or 3.4 knots/second to 40 knots in 10.4 seconds, and about 330 feet? So doubling is only 600 feet. I avoided the math and safe-sided the heck out of it and got a way too big figure. Thanks for the extra work ![]() Using one engine, 0.09 g's gives 1.7 knots/sec, 21 seconds to 40 knots, and 640 feet, doubled to 1280. With all due respect to Mike B, I might be happy with one engine. Eric Greenwell For self-launch, perhaps, but for 100 knot level flight, or 500 fpm climb, 200 Newtons (45 lbf) may be not enough. I haven't done the disciplined math for this, nor do I know the actual drag in Newtons of the Sparrowhawk. I suppose this can be calculated rather than SWAGed based on weight and the shape of the polar, eh? Any takers? ![]() That's an easy one. Basically, the weight/(L:d) at the speed of interest. Sticking with the 500 pounds weight, the drag at best L ![]() is 500lb/36=14 pounds, leaving 30 pounds thrust to climb. 500/30=17 L ![]() climbing; climb rate is [59 knots at best L ![]() great, but interesting. For 500 fpm climb, a 56 lbf unit would do it. For a 2000 foot climb: - 2000'/350fpm = 6 minutes - 6 min x 460 grams/min = 1200 grams, or almost a gallon liquid. So, carrying 5 gallons would give you one launch, a 4000 foot climb out of a big holes, and some travel towards home at 100 knots. The L ![]() goal is met with one engine. OK, these are a bit optimistic, because I assumed the engine added no drag. It does show one engine is close to being good, but a 55-60 lbf engine would be "ideal". -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA Have you math whizzes figured out how far the wing runner will have to run before this dog whistle is going fast enough to have aileron control? Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sport Pilot - School Won't Offer | Gary G | Piloting | 38 | February 16th 05 10:41 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
I wish I'd never got into this... | Kevin Neave | Soaring | 32 | September 19th 03 12:18 PM |
Restricting Glider Ops at Public Arpt. | rjciii | Soaring | 36 | August 25th 03 04:50 PM |
Announce/USA: FAA Glider Flying Handbook / Bob Wander | SoarBooks | Soaring | 0 | August 11th 03 03:55 PM |