![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While I concur wholeheartedly with your sentiments, I have a slightly
different view of debates surrounding accidents. Aviation is a unique business and those participating in it have unique skills. It does not further knowledge to wait for a predictable report, arriving in a year, which concludes that "Both pilots were in VMC and responsible for their own separation." "Neither pilot had filed a flight plan." No one wishes the families of accident victims ill. We all empathize with their grief. On the other hand, if we can learn one single thing from ongoing discussion that will make our flying safer, we ought not stifle such a discussion. The Airlines learned this many years ago. Within days of an accident or incident, there is a full disclosure (usually internal) of the events surrounding the episode. The hope is that the professional aviator can and will learn from such an event. Perhaps by questioning his or her own behavior or by imagining what could have been done differently to avoid the accident, one can become a safer pilot. This is not a bad thing and no disrespect to participants or survivors is intended or implied. The day we stop learning from the mistakes of others (and ourselves) is the day we should "hang it up and retire to the rocking chair." Allan "Jack" wrote in message ... The emotional responses to accidents are even more predictable than the causes. I can't remember an instance where the wife of a professional pilot involved in a tragic accident did not immediately conclude that pilot error could not possibly have been a factor, because her husband was such a conscientious professional. Often the facts eventually prove otherwise. Nor have I seen an instance where members of the public didn't immediately offer explanations for an accident about which they could not possibly have any direct knowledge. That too is natural human behavior, unfortunately. The media, mercenaries who fan emotional sparks for their own purposes, prod us to jump to conclusions (sometimes with the help of so-called "experts"), while the real experts, investigators who actually have the responsibility to find the truth, take many months to publish an official finding. It's not too much to ask that the family and friends be given plenty of leeway, and that the rest of us exercise restraint. Those still in shock from the loss cannot be expected to be objective. The rest of us can certainly sympathize, and while doing so it might be wise to also give thanks that we are not in a position to empathize. Jack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Plane-crashes because of collision with bees ??? | Dan Simper | Piloting | 18 | February 13th 05 07:37 PM |
Airspeed of military planes | Tetsuji Rai | Piloting | 100 | April 24th 04 02:27 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
"China blamed in '01 air collision" | Mike Yared | Naval Aviation | 8 | September 15th 03 05:07 PM |
"China blamed in '01 air collision" | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 2 | September 14th 03 06:08 PM |