![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you have a CAD program that will allow you to impose tangency
constraints as well as point location (like CATIA or UniGraphics), you can force the curve to be vertical at the leading edge. In Xfoil you can effectively do this by placing a point just above the 0,0 LE point, and placing another point just below. For example, change the three points at the LE... 0.001070 0.004620 0.000000 0.000000 0.001070 -0.001450 to... 0.001070 0.004620 0.0 0.00001 0.000000 0.000000 0.0 -0.00001 0.001070 -0.001450 Xfoil's arc-length spline parameterization doesn't care about the resulting very non-uniform point spacing, so these new coordinates spline OK without any difficulty. But in the case of the original FX67-150 coordinates, this still produces overshoots, with a concavity below the LE point (top looks better, but still wavy). The real problem is that the necessary geometric information is simply not present in the coarse coordinates. An adequately-smooth interpolated shape has to be literally "made up" in one way or another. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mandrel for 306/-2 (1/8 in) and 471-2 fitting? | Boelkowj | Home Built | 2 | February 6th 05 02:00 PM |
S-18 airfoil | JDKAHN | Home Built | 0 | October 30th 04 04:35 AM |
can't quite grasp the "power available" curve | xerj | Piloting | 6 | September 12th 04 12:33 PM |
Straight restrictor fitting? | nauga | Home Built | 5 | April 15th 04 01:06 PM |
18m polar curve | Alan Irving | Soaring | 1 | December 15th 03 11:45 PM |