![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stewart Kissel wrote:
Well it is mid-winter, when Puch-spinning competes with the PW-5 flaming, 2-33 viability, and what-sorta-hat-to-wear as a topic. (NOT INTENDED TO MAKE LIGHT OF THE SERIOUSNESS OF THIS TOPIC) After a review of old threads on this topic, I was interested in not finding a pilot's report on difficulty in the spin-recovery characteristics of this ship. Anyone out there in ras-world care to comment on a first-person experience? The club I am a member of requires spin training in the Puchatz prior to flying it solo. To demonstrate that a spin is not an uncontrollable event he had me enter the spin from a nose high attitude, just prior to the stall I kicked in rudder. I was then to hold the glider in the spin for two full revolutions before taking it out. I had to do that in both directions. After that we took another tow and I did 3 or 4 incipient spins in each direction. The spins were totally predictable. I do not recall how long it took to recover from the fully developed spin, but I never had the feeling we were not going to get out of it. In the spin the Puch's nose will go beyond vertical. You can really notice this when flying from the backseat. (The Blanik L-13 will do this also.) I was very happy for the spin training I got. Since then I have gotten into two inadvertent spins. Both times I recognized them for what they were and recovered with a minimal lose of altitude and no panic. BTW, now that I am an instructor I teach spins differently. No one gets in trouble from an intentional stall then kicking the rudder over to induce the spin. I teach it by simulating a low approach on base leg. In this situation the pilot is inadvertently pulling the stick back, trying to keep the plane up, but actually only lowering its speed. Often times folks will then make a shallow turn to final, on the mistaken believe that a shallow turn will loose less altitude. The turn is initiated in the same place they normally would make their turn. When it becomes apparent that the runway will be overshot, still not willing to steeply bank the glider, it is then over rudder to try to make the turn. Since the pilot has been pulling back on the stick he is now slow enough to cause a stall and resultant spin too low to the ground to recover. After explaining on the ground what we are going to do I demonstrate the spin , at quite high altitude. I will allow the glider to do about half a spin revolution. This is enough to get the students attention to the seriousness of this happening at low altitude, but not enough to waste a lot of altitude or severely scare the student. I then have them practice entering and recovering incipient spins in both directions. I do not solo any student or transition pilot until they can explain and demonstrate what causes a spin and how to recover from one. At 15:42 23 January 2004, Owain Walters wrote: Everyone is always an expert arent they? Why do internet lurkers always have an opinion on things they dont know the first fact about? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
SR22 Spin Recovery | gwengler | Piloting | 9 | September 24th 04 07:31 AM |
Cirrus and Lancair Make Bonanza Obsolete? | Potential Bo Buyer | Owning | 211 | November 20th 03 05:29 AM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |