![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Nicholas wrote:
Shawn Curry wrote "So I'm a test pilot every time I fly from my home field at 7,500 ft MSL?" I suspect you may be, if you go in for multi-turns spins at much above that sort of altitude. That's the point I was asking about. What do you think? More conventional high flying is probably within the range of Reynolds numbers that correspond with tests, provided you don't push the envelope at the edges. Also the difference in density and RN is not great from 7,000 to 7500 feet. If you know all this, of course, you can educate me by telling me the answers. If you don't - . . . back to your own question, I think, or perhaps an aerodynamicist could tell us both (and any others who may be interested). The higher you go, of course, the more difference it makes. As pointed out in other threads, if you go high enough, you stall at the same speed as flutter onset, which leaves no usable envelope at all. In my earlier post about true velocities/IAS/density/AoA/rotational speed etc., as I don't know if everyone realises their tie up with Reynolds numbers, I deliberately didn't refer to RN. Few (certainly not me) would know off by heart the formulae, even if they have heard of the things, or how the other factors and RN change with height. I did, however, presume that all post bronze or equivalent people will have done some reading on true vs IAS, flight envelopes, etc.. and might therefore appreciate that the geometry of a spin, effectiveness of control surfaces, and rotational aspects, high up could be different from lower down. My education on the subject has been to the extent that TAS increases for a given altitude vs IAS and the need to decrease Vne to avoid flutter at altitude. The notion that RN changes significantly from sea level to 17,999 feet (where I often fly over Colorado) and that this changes how the aircraft performes WRT spins, or any other performance factor is news to me. From reading about the PERLAN project in Soaring a couple years ago, I new this was significant at 100,000 ft MSL. Maybe someone else can give more insight into real changes up to the bottom of Class A. Shawn |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Puchaz Spinning thread that might be of interest in light of the recent accident. | Al | Soaring | 134 | February 9th 04 03:44 PM |
Spinning (mis)concepts | Arnold Pieper | Soaring | 106 | February 7th 04 01:02 PM |
Spinning Horizon | Mike Adams | Owning | 8 | December 26th 03 01:35 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |