![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:07:52 -0800, Jim wrote:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 16:06:08 -0500, Todd Pattist wrote: Bruce Greeff wrote: You are correct that their vertical component of velocity must be the same because of geometry, if the bank angle remains constant. However, because the inner wing is describing a smaller diameter spiral the relative wind will present at a higher angle of attack on the inner wing tip - relative to the outer wingtip. This is quite true, but it's the difference in the horizontal velocity that causes the difference in the angle of attack, and IIRC, that's what Robert said in his earlier post in this thread when he wrote: "Some difference in AOA between both wings is already provided by the simple fact that the glider is sinking, i.e. both wings have the same vertical component of velocity but different horizontal ones. " In the same time the inner tip travels a smaller distance, but descends the same vertical distance, hence the greater angle of descent, not rate. True, but Jim was disagreeing with Robert when he (incorrectly) wrote: "In a descending turn, which is what gliders do in turns, it is not the case that both wings have the same vertical component of velocity." People seem to continuously confuse rates and angles? Too true :-) Todd Pattist - "WH" Ventus C (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) Thank you for pointing this out! I guess my fingers on the keyboard out ran my brains. I should not have gone farther than just the observation that the inside wing in a stable descending turn is going down while the outside wing is going up ( and the opposite situation in an ascending turn). I guess I really don't understand the notion of differing horizontal vs vertical "components". In other words, the aircraft is actively rolling about its longitudinal axis during the turns. From this I incorrectly deduced that one wing was moving downward more than was the other wing. I also wish I could remember where I first read this description. It was in a book about stalling and spinning by the fellow who I believe flew with Tony DeVere and originally set up the emergency maneuver training at Santa Paula. Oh well, this is hardly the only memory that has vaporized from my ageing brain! Now I remember! The book is "Stalling, spinning and safety" by Sammy Mason. It's a good read. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inspiration by friends - mutal interest and motivation to get the PPL | Gary G | Piloting | 1 | October 29th 04 09:19 PM |
Baby Bush will be Closing Airports in California to VFR Flight Again | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 119 | March 13th 04 02:56 AM |
Some Fiction For Interest | Badwater Bill | Rotorcraft | 8 | March 6th 04 03:45 AM |
Spinning Horizon | Mike Adams | Owning | 8 | December 26th 03 01:35 AM |