![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 20:57:58 +0100, Stefan
wrote: I've flown a Janus behind a G3-Mirage. It takes definitely longer to get off the ground, but once airborne, the climb rate is nearly that of an "ordinary" plane. The whole tow takes a bit longer, but due to the much lower cost of the UL, it's still much cheaper. I'd say it works fine from a paved runway or from a long grass runway. Not recommended from short runways or with a tailwind, especially if the rope break options are difficult or if there are obstacles at the end of the runway. I heard from a reliable source that aerotow tests with a single-seater (iirc Ventus) behind an Impule 100 with a 100 hp Rotax 912S showed a climb rate of more than 1.000 fpm... (!). This might be the first ultralight that is a full replacement for a Remorqeur, even on less-than-perfect conditions. It helps significantly if the tow plane is aerodynamically clean. The G3 Mirage and Mattin Wezel's Condor are NOT clean. Bye Andreas |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Skycraft Landing Light Question | Jay Honeck | Owning | 15 | February 3rd 05 06:49 PM |
C-172 landing light switch | JFLEISC | Piloting | 16 | May 6th 04 01:15 AM |
C-172 landing light switch | JFLEISC | Owning | 10 | May 5th 04 11:05 PM |
The light bulb | Greasy Rider | Military Aviation | 6 | March 2nd 04 12:07 PM |
OT but very funny after some of the posts we have had of late. | Mycroft | Military Aviation | 1 | August 8th 03 10:09 PM |