![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kirk,
These are my experiences as a trainee... When I learnt to glider, all my spin training was done from straight from 2000' aerotows. My instructor pulled the nose up booted the rudder in and over we went.. Over time he allowed me to do the same. My thoughts at the time were that if for some reason I pulled the nose up hard I would not boot the rudder in and wondered why anyone would.. A few months later I had changed clubs and was flying with an instructor who first demonstrated how nose low spins could happen.. The first time we did this at 1000' ft I had an almost irresitable urge as the world went green/brown to pull back on the stick.. That was one of the most memorable moments of being instructed.. Mark At 14:18 10 February 2004, Kirk Stant wrote: (Mark James Boyd) wrote in message news:... W.J. \(Bill\) Dean \(U.K.\). wrote: 'As this training progresses, it is necessary to introduce brief spins where the ground is noticeably close. This reminds me of the old FAA requirement to practice twin engine-out procedures (Vmc demonstration) at low altitudes during multiengine training, the reasoning being the low performance of the existing twin-engined trainers required a low altitude in order to have any single-engine climb available to show. Apparently, this killed a LOT of pilots due to stall spins at low altitude in light twins - not fun with an engine caged! - until the FAA decided that the cure was a lot worse than the disease. Sure, with a really experienced instructor, and a really trusted glider, a low altitude spin could be 'safely' demonstrated. But I'm not totally convinced that it is necessary for the lesson to sink in. OTOH, in the context of spin training, it is absolutely vital to beat into the students head the nasty impact (pun intended) of a surprise low altitude departure. You guys (the Brits) can possibly get away with it, due to much more standardization (a good thing). I would hate to see it adopted in the US, where standardization is a one of dem big woids we aint learnd in skool. How about our French, German, Dutch, etc. colleagues - How low do you teach (or demonstrate; not necessarily the same thing) low altitude spin entries? BTW, don't forget 1812 (we still need to burn 10 Downling Street) and Suez (Now there was a virtuous war!). Just joking, we love you man! Kirk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inside A U.S. Election Vote Counting Program | Peter Twydell | Military Aviation | 0 | July 10th 03 08:28 AM |