![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Vaughn wrote: "Mark James Boyd" wrote in message news:402bf598$1@darkstar... Aerobatics with less than 3 miles vis is prohibited in the US without waiver, as far as I know... And in the US you would have to remain at least 1000' above the cloud (assuming class E or class G 1200' agl.) actually, there are some fairly large areas of "G" airspace which go up to 10,000+ here in CA and NV. Spin down to cloud level, then level descent through the deck. I've never done it myself, but I'd bet money Carl Herold has... Not a whole lot of traffic in these areas either, so that's a very minor issue (big sky, little bullet theory). Stupid? Maybe (for some folks). Legal, sure. but the idea still might have merit given the theory that clouds are usually soft and empty but the ground is invariably hard. The guy who told me he spun through a cloud intentionally in his Pitts said it was psycholigically REALLY hard to hold the spin through the 500 foot layer through to break out... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inside A U.S. Election Vote Counting Program | Peter Twydell | Military Aviation | 0 | July 10th 03 08:28 AM |