![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "André Somers" wrote in message ... John Gilbert wrote: Angular guages perhaps. Sweeps of 180 to 270 degrees are quite readable, I agree. But what does the study say about altimeters with dual needles, that rotate multiple times? How many times have you misread the altitude or had to think hard to get it right? This has to be the most confusing instrument to read, unless you don't really care about knowing about that last +/- 1000 feet. Well... hardly ever, but maybe that's because our meters are, well, in meters :-) That means a full spin round is 1000m. Not something you'd easily misjudge I think. André I've flown airplanes with metric instruments (And Russian placards too). The airspeed, rate-of-climb, RPM, manifold pressure were no problem. Numbers is numbers I guess - fly with the needles in the green arc and everything works. But that damn metric altimeter was impossible - no way to read trends on an instrument that insensitive. With an altimeter that reads 1000 feet (304.8 meters) per rev of the big hand, you can thermal by watching the trend of the needle. Responding to "YO": Some people like analog gauges and some don't. Ergonomic studies just produce averages which may be useful to marketeers but what's important individually is what works best for that particular user. If the data are displayed on an electronic screen, the user can select the display method in a setup dialog box. i.e. check box one for round gauge analog, box two for vertical tape with a digit window etc... Check another box for metric or imperial units. With altitude in meters, expanding the scale of a vertical tape gives the same sensitivity as with imperial units. I've also flown with both vertical tapes and round gauges. At first the tapes were confusing but once adapted to the idea of having all the "V" speeds floating alongside the tape with the trend indicators, going back to round mechanical gauges seemed like the stone age. I vote for computer graphic displays of primary flight data. Graphical displays are inevitable anyway since all those little watchmakers who built and repaired mechanical instruments are all retired or dead now. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Free Flight Planning Software | Dean Wilkinson | Products | 0 | September 18th 04 10:44 PM |
Flight instructors as Charter Pilots | C J Campbell | Piloting | 6 | January 24th 04 07:51 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |