![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Bruce Hoult wrote: In article , Stewart Kissel wrote: http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief2.asp?...0417&ntsbno=CH I04CA090&akey=1 That looks more like: "if the manufacturer issues an AD [1], you'd probably better do it, whether you legally have to or not". -- Bruce [1] in this case, installing a locking device onto L'Hotellier connectors. I'm really happy the pilot escaped death. This has been fatal in other accidents. 1. So, assuming there was insurance, would this accident be covered? Or would the insurer say: a) you didn't put it together correctly; bad dog, no coverage b) you didn't comply with the AD; bad dog, no coverage c) both 2. Will the pilot then say, hey, what about my annual condition inspection? How come the annual was signed off if the ship didn't comply with an AD? 3. Then what happens when the mechanic says, gosh, the service I contract with for AD updates didn't show this AD, so I didn't know to look for it and would have not signed it off it had I known? Inquiring minds want to know! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ELT Checks | Kevin Chandler | Owning | 28 | September 16th 10 02:47 PM |
Formation flying | Bingo | Home Built | 21 | August 23rd 04 12:51 AM |
~ 8 MORE DEAD US SOLDIERS - 93 IN APRIL SO FAR - BUSH CHECKS TURKEY | MORRIS434 | Military Aviation | 0 | April 22nd 04 09:44 AM |
A couple Questions-Ramp Checks and Experimental Operations | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 48 | October 8th 03 09:11 PM |
Flight Checks | Mark Jackson | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 24th 03 06:39 PM |