A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why is Soaring declining



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old April 15th 04, 09:55 AM
Ian Johnston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 06:29:53 UTC, (Lennie
the Lurker) wrote:

: Then look at how many of the voices ripping the pw actually have flown
: or own one. Not a very good ratio of first hand knowledge to personal
: opinion. Probably closer to 5% first hand and 95% ignorant badmouth.
: 2-33, 1-26, PW-5, Russia, makes no difference, it's below 40:1 and
: anything that can be said negatively will be. Nobody asks if it's
: serving the purpose for which it was designed.

As a 34:1 chap myself, and a strong supporter of the SIFOWs brigade, I
have nothing against the PW-5 per se. However, I am not sure that it
has fulfilled the purpose for which it was designed:

1) Stimulating interest by being affordable. Unfortunately for the
PW-5 (and the Silent, and the Russia, and ...) there are just too many
second hand gliders around for the same sort of money, and a ten year
old glider isn't nearly such an off-putting proposition as a ten-year
old car. So in this respect it has failed - it hasn't caused a surge
of interest, even if it costs what it was meant to. This is not to
disparage some local successes - it seems to have given the people in
New Zealand a way to renew a predominately Ka6 club fleet effectively
and popularly.

2) Stimulating interest by being a competition class. Unfortunately
for the PW-5, there just aren't that many pilots around who care about
competing. And, almost by definition, those who don't care enough to
be selling their houses, spouses and cars to buy something big and
modern are also unlikely to pay a premium for occasional lower-level
competition. It's a shame that more top-end pilots haven't taken to
it, but I suspect that the competition year is already pretty crowded.

I haven't flown one, though I'd like to, particularly to see how it
compares with my Pirat. From all accounts it's a very nice wee glider,
but I'm afraid that as far as renewing the sport goes, it has been a
failure. The cheap, simple, competitive gliders which attract people
into flying have lots of strings and pack intoa big rucksack. Maybe
the conventional gliding world should swallow its pride, descend from
its high horse, make common cause - and try to lure the paragliders
across when they get to an age when breaking ankles seems less
attractive ...

Ian
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Advanced Soaring Seminar - Eastern PA B Lacovara Home Built 0 February 9th 04 01:55 AM
Advanced Soaring Seminar - Eastern PA B Lacovara Soaring 0 January 26th 04 07:55 PM
Soaring Safety Seminar - SSA Convention Burt Compton Soaring 0 January 26th 04 03:57 PM
Soaring Safety Seminar Wednesday - Atlanta Burt Compton Soaring 0 January 19th 04 02:51 AM
January/February 2004 issue of Southern California Soaring is on-line [email protected] Soaring 8 January 4th 04 09:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.