![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jamie Denton wrote:
Your silver, as it stands at the moment, says to an insurance company that, with an amount of certainty, that you have a certain level of competence neccesary for the silver badge, introducing COTS loggers for the silvers cannot help but reduce that level of certainty, as cannot be avoided that it is easier to hack these devices (due to there being easier ways to manipulate files these devices, I'm not saying current loggers are immune to hacking, but COTS systems certainly lower the bar). The security system surrounding badges isn't only the log file but the entire set of circumstances surrounding the flight. That's why the OO is still an integral part of the system despite all the IGC's efforts to dehumanise it. It's unrealistic to try to build a system based solely on "impregnable" technology as the IGC seems to have set out to do. Here's how silly it is. The level of security around the logbooks and licence required to get a pilot's job at an airline is orders of magnitude less than for the documentation required to claim a Silver Badge! The basis for the logbook and licence security (and it's not perfect, it's adequate) is the web of checkable human contacts defined in those documents. No sealed loggers are involved. The OO is the link with a similar human web for the badge system and, used properly, would provide adequate surety that the flight is genuine while allowing significantly less secure - and much cheaper - technology to be used. Perfection in human affairs is unattainable. Adequate security is all you can usefully aim for. Excessive security is very wasteful and expensive as the soaring community now knows. Reducing excessive to adequate would be a win for the entire gliding community. Hypothetically, taken to it's extreme, if silver paperwork became a self declaration job, involving you to simply self declare you completed the task, with no OO or logger evidence, we would not expect an insurance company to take it seriously as a measure of competance, as there is no worthwhile evidence. Nobody suggested that. Adequate security doesn't mean no security. If we allow COTS units, we lower the standard of proof neccesary for badges, we devalue the Silver badge etc in the eyes of the insurance companies... I'd be careful before lowering the bar... few people may cheat, but insurance companies don't always act rationally.... Yes they do. They're going to set their premiums where they can make a profit based on claims experience. Just like they do now. Graeme Cant |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |