![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 13:22:00 +0200, Janos Bauer How does it devalue the Silver C? It's just another way of documenting it... Sure, if there's a proper paper trail - by that I mean with some sort of approved FR and the paper work inspected, checked and signed off by an OO then no problem. COTS is OK if they get type approval and/or the IGC publish an FR requirements spec and mandate that the pilot must demonstrate that his FR can match or exceed that spec. I think a lot of us think that the O/O looking at the trace immediately after the flight is really the key. It's hard to fake a trace with the takeoff and release happening at exactly the time and place the towpilot observed, and then modifying it in flight. A good O/O should be able to notice such discrepencies... Just my opinion, but I think the O/O is the real key, not the logger security... -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |