![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you running them both of the same TE line? If you split the line
too close to the varios, they will interfere with each other causing "jumpiness" Yes they use the same TE line, each has about 4" of lead from the "T" split. I have no idea if that's "too close" to the varios... Also, if you are using electronic compensation for the 302, have you tried adjusting this? I have the TE line connected to the 302, so I guess the answer to this question is no, I'm not using electronic compensationl. The parameter on page 9 (or is it 10?) for this is set to 0. This morning I tweaked some settings using the PC software, and subsequently the vario function worked properly, including reading zero on bootup. However the speed to fly function is still nonfunctional. It wants me to fly, like, zero knots or something. I triple and quadruple checked all the settings so I'm pretty much stumped on this one. 2NO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cambridge Instruments | Ian McPhee | Soaring | 2 | June 18th 04 10:14 AM |
Cambridge Aero Explorer Fix | Guy Byars | Soaring | 8 | May 19th 04 03:04 AM |
learning curve in fs 2002.. | David Ciemny | Simulators | 5 | December 30th 03 12:18 AM |
Updated IGC approval documents for Cambridge GNSS flight recorders | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | August 27th 03 05:28 PM |
Cambridge Aero Instruments | Ulrich | Soaring | 6 | August 7th 03 05:48 PM |