Circling for rodents?

Bill Daniels wrote:

C'mon, now. Binocular depth perception ends for humans at about 20 feet and
is only really useful up to arms length, yet we can still judge distance
well. Since the bird is moving, they can use dynamic field depth perception
that has nothing to do with interocular distance.

Close one eye and move your head back and forth or up and down. You will
see what I mean. Birds and other small animals are observed to move their
heads constantly to better judge distances.

Ever ride one of those glass elevators (lifts) on the outside of a tall
building? Did you notice how powerful the impression of climbing is?

I still claim that they can see themselves rise away from the ground.
Excellent vision and the experience to use it to the fullest is the likely
explanation. It's the simplest explanation and requires no internal vario.


I can't believe that, except for very low heights. The elevator experience
you mention mention is for such heights, or at least when something (the
building itself) is very near.

The best processing system (e.g. the bird's brain) cannot infer anything
from missing or non significative input. In the case of climbing, the only
information on which you say they rely is the change in the apparent size
of ground features. I didn't do the computation, but I bet that the change
during one full turn is below the optical resolution of a bird's eye. In
this domain, we are better equiped than they are, our eyes are larger.
Nevertheless we can't decide if a glider or a bird is climbing when watching
them from below just by watching the change of their size during a short
time, except when they are very low. However I agree that after watching
a bird for a long time, as it changed from a beautiful thing with discernable
separate feathers at the tips to a vanishing little point in the sky, I can
say that it was climbing.