![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are right, Eric. Bad example. I should be smart enough to not talk
about sports that I am not really familiar with. Nonetheless, that is how my very experienced friend explained it to me. -Bob Korves "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... Bob Korves wrote: I have a friend who raced all sorts of things -- 50cc Grand Prix motorcycles, Formula V, CanAm, etc. His observation, which is perhaps counterintuitive, was that the tighter rules a class has, the more expensive it is to win. For instance, he said that with Formula V, a class designed to be simple and cheap, if you don't have a chassis dynamometer you cannot win. Bad example: Formula V is MUCHMUCHMUCH cheaper than CanAm cars! You can't even buy an engine for a CanAm car for the price of a Formula V. Sheez! They use PLENTY of dyno time in that class. You don't need to own a dyno to do well in Formula V, just rent some time on one, or take it to a track during the testing period and use some simple instrumentation to accomplish the same thing. Because of the restrictive rules, spending a lot of money gains you very little, unlike the less limited classes where spending a lot of money gains you quite a bit. Unless the rules have changed dramatically since I raced Formula V (in which case they would no longer be very restrictive rules), it's a relatively cheap class because the cars are light and low powered, so the engine and tires hold up well. The small size of the cars and the high minimum weight requirement makes makes their construction simple and cheap. The rules are too tight to win otherwise. You can spend a pile of money, but in Formula V, one properly done pass using the "draft" behind another car totally outweighs that money. Been there, done that, watched it happen many times. With CanAm, which had bigger and faster cars but was a wide open class WRT rules, cleverness in design could easily win the day without huge expense. Absolute nonsense. The cost of a quality team to come up with this "cleverness in design" is enormous, and the cost of maintaining these cars that truly live on the edge of destruction each race is enormous. Check the decals on a CanAm car and Formula V to see the kind of sponsorship it takes to field one of those cars competitively. Millions! There is simply no comparison with Formula V. I think you have totally misunderstood the situation. (snip) Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|