![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With the big spoilers on modern gliders, there's not much risk in
adding 10 extra knots, and while your argument that it adds an increased cushion before stall is unarguable, I guess the measure of value comes in whether that reduced risk is a justified departure from the "correct" pattern airspeed. I'm with Mark... it deserves some more discussion. BTW, as I noted in another thread, spins are not caused by lack of airspeed, but uncoordinated use of the controls -- at least in modern sailplanes. Two things must happen to enter a spin: 1) you must stall, and 2) you must fail to apply sufficient rudder during your attempt to pick up the low wing with aileron. That is, the sailplane is designed with enough rudder to stop autorotation, even with full deflection of the aileron throughout the stall break. As demonstrated by my thread last fall, a Ventus 2 won't spin if the controls remain coordinated (half stick/half rudder... full stick/rudder). It enters a controlable spiral, instead. However, half rudder and full stick (or half stick and no rudder) would induce a spin if the stick is held full back throughout the stall break. Avoiding the stall is the first most important step, but thorough training of the appropriate response during an inadvertent stall is a close, close second. And I could even argue that it's more important, since once you've stalled by accident, the outcome is determined by how well you've been trained to recover (that is, it becomes the failsafe for your stall avoidance error). Though I'm not a fan of axiomatic training, there's some value in remembering that you can stall at any attitude and any speed. If you wear that axiom on your sleeve, then you'd be best served by understanding and practicing superlative stall recovery technique in addition to practicing stall avoidance. That so many capable pilots have stall/spun in relatively docile aircraft indicates to me that there is a training gap. We are clearly handling the controls diffently at low altitudes. Why? If we can agree that this is the case, then adding speed is good insurance. But it doesn't address the cause. Andy, apologies for being the pedant. I'm spitting this stuff out at 60 words per minute, so I'm not giving much thought to "balance." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
SR22 Spin Recovery | gwengler | Piloting | 9 | September 24th 04 07:31 AM |
Spin Training | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 6 | February 16th 04 04:49 PM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |