A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How Low to Spin??



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old September 3rd 04, 09:51 PM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tom Seim wrote:

I recently read the accident report of the ASW20 crash (fatal) at
Williams, CA. Per the check list, they did a positive control check of
the elevator by having the assistant (co-owner) hold the elevator
while the pilot applied force on the stick. Resistance was felt, check
list passed. Only problem was the elevator was not hooked up and what
the pilot felt was the push rod hitting the bottom of the elevator.
Now, if the guy just LOOKED at the connection it would have been
obvious that it was not hooked up (it is in plain site).

Following a list may give you tunnel
vision. A DC-9 was landed gear up by two experienced pilots following
a check list (they missed one step). They were so certain that they
had done everything right that they ignored the lack of the sound and
thump of the gear lowering (common sense, again).


I took my CFIG checkride with the FAA. On it, I told him
"there is no PCC in the schweizer manual for any checklist. The
checklist requires inspection during preflight of the connections.
I find the (over)use of the PCC distracts the pilot from the
more important action: checking the connection itself."

He nodded, and we moved on to other things.

My understanding of contests is that an "assisted PCC" is
required by many CDs. I wonder if an "assisted connection inspection"
wouldn't be a better, higher, priority...

As far as the DC-9, I'd guess this is another example of
information which is lost in the noise.

I remember asking a car dealer about his warranty. He had a
super long list of covered items. He said just about everything was
covered. I asked him to make a nice short list of what WASN'T
covered. He couldn't, and we parted.

Useful information is prioritized. When I write professionally,
I do a 200 word abstract, then a 1000 word introduction/summary,
then a 5000 word detail. And yes, the 200 word abstract is first.
I'd like to see all writing (including the checklists) follow this
idea. A few important points at the front, the nit details at the back.
--

------------+
Mark Boyd
Avenal, California, USA
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
SR22 Spin Recovery gwengler Piloting 9 September 24th 04 07:31 AM
Spin Training JJ Sinclair Soaring 6 February 16th 04 04:49 PM
Cessna 150 Price Outlook Charles Talleyrand Owning 80 October 16th 03 02:18 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.