![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Like Eric, I prefer (slightly) the larger screens as found on the iPAQ 3800 and 3900 and 5000 series over the 2200 series units. Eric's testing shows that the 3800 (with reflective TFT display) looks a little better in sunlight than the 3900 and 5000 (with transflective TFT display). My testing shows that they are very similar and the difference is hardly worth going back to using an old 3800 over a new 5000 series unit. Other soaring pilots such as Team StrePla in Germany agree with Eric that the 3800 series is the best color option. I have a lot of respect for both Eric and Team StrePla but I prefer the fastest available processor as found in the 3900, 5000 and especially the new 4700 series. Certainly, no Pocket PC made today offers an LCD display that is as readable in sunlight as we'd all like. But many pilots make due because they offer very nice features like the graphical depiciton of reachable airports on the map. I use a 2200 and 3970 and 4705 for my soaring flights. I really like the 2215 and 4705 because they have optional large batteries that are great for powering the Pocket PC and a CF GPS for many hours of soaring flight. The optional CF Card expansion pack plus with optional large battery for the 3900 series also works well but is pricey once you buy the basic expansion pack and then add the large battery (you can't buy the expansion pack with the large battery). Good Soaring, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. http://www.cumulus-soaring.com "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... Mal Williams wrote: I was going to buy an iPAQ 2210 for use as a final glide computer, but have been advised that the old 39xx series is better, even though out of production. Has anyone used the 2210? Is it any good? I have a 2210 and a 3835. I find the 2210 screen is usable in the cockpit, but the 3835 screen is definitely better, and that's what I use. I believe the 39xx series uses a screen similar to the 2210, but I haven't compared them. The very best thing to do is look at them yourself, outside in the sunlight and in the shade. If you compare them indoors, you will think the 2210 has the best display. Otherwise, it's a very nice unit. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
iPaq and LX5000 connectivity question (hardware?) | Ted Wagner | Soaring | 1 | April 22nd 04 09:29 PM |
Commercial - iPAQ Cradle Changes | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | April 9th 04 03:29 PM |
iPaq wiring, cradles and mounts for gliders - Ideas?? | Jim Kelly | Soaring | 12 | December 4th 03 11:45 PM |
iPAQ h2210/h2215 Review | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | September 3rd 03 03:45 AM |
iPaq screen viewability | Raphael Warshaw | Soaring | 7 | July 27th 03 06:02 PM |