![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Imagine you get things wrong and are caught out low on final,
still a fair distance out, and it looks marginal whether you are going to reach the runway or not. One technique I have sometimes heard described is to dive for the deck and complete the remaining distance in ground effect. For the sake of the argument we can assume fairly flat ground, free of obstacles, though not necessarily landable. A few years ago Soaring Magazine reported experiments on this undertaken (I believe) by the airforce glider program. They used Blaniks and a very long runway. The conclusion was that it was better to stay at max glide and not dive for the ground. I forget though how much wind they had -- there is some headwind (50 mph) and gradient (to zero at ground level) where it has to be better to dive. And Blaniks are pretty bad at high speed -- though will have more induced drag at any speed in ground effect too. John Cochrane BB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Meredith Effect | Corky Scott | Home Built | 19 | September 4th 04 04:01 PM |
Toronto Area Glider Pilot Ground School Starts Thu. March 25, 2004 | Ulf | Soaring | 0 | March 3rd 04 05:02 PM |
Wing in Ground Effect? | BllFs6 | Home Built | 10 | December 18th 03 05:11 AM |
Why did Britain win the BoB? | Grantland | Military Aviation | 79 | October 15th 03 03:34 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |