![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andreas Maurer wrote: I bet that this FAA examiner has never done that either in a modern glider with an L/D over 30 - otherwise he's know that it's going to take a runway of *at least* 6.000 ft and a sideslip to *very* low altitude to be able to land without using the airbrakes. Considering the L/D is increased by ground effect, even doubled according to some, you have a point. But even with an L/D of 1:80, if you sideslip to 1 m off the ground you'll only float 80 m, about 260ft, from there, and quite a bit less with a headwind. Agreed that the precision needed to slip it down that low is probably too much to ask of someone just about to get their licence, but it does not sound too crazy as an exercise at a more experienced level. In case you get it wrong you should of course be ready to abort and pull the brakes well before there is any danger of going off the far end. Cheers CV |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tamed by the Tailwheel | [email protected] | Piloting | 84 | January 18th 05 04:08 PM |
VW-1 C-121J landing with unlocked nose wheel | Mel Davidow LT USNR Ret | Military Aviation | 1 | January 19th 04 05:22 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
FAA Knowledge Test Results | Richard Moore | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 12th 03 07:10 AM |
FAA Knowledge Test Results | Richard Moore | Simulators | 3 | October 12th 03 04:48 AM |