A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

US Dollar sinks to new low against Euro



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old November 11th 04, 09:27 PM
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob Kuykendall wrote:

I tend to believe that the legacy of span-limited competition classes
is such that sailplane buyers will tend to gravitate towards
competition spans, even those with very weak inclination to ever
compete. That's one of the reasons I'd like to see a distinct
competition class for sub-15m ships; and I think that 13m would be a
perfectly good place to draw the line.


This effect should not be an issue here, since we are talking about
performance identical to an LS4. So, it would do exactly as well in any
contest as an LS4. I don't know if it would be immediately accepted into
the club class since I'm not familiar with the rules, but if has the
same performance as an LS4 and the same price, why not?

A 13-meter class would collect all the Russias, Apii (Apia?), PW5s,
and Sparrowhawks, though sadly leave the 14m L33 (TG-10D for
USAFAians) out in the cold. It would give people at least a plausable
excuse to buy these little gliders, and give developers an economic
basis for developing them. And I think that it would be a kick-ass fun
class to fly in, since I'm just the right size for it and I'm used to
flying a few points short of a Libelle.


I like the idea of encouraging smaller gliders with a class, but I'm
more in favor of "performance bracket" classes than span classes. THe
European club class is such a class. By handicapping over a small range
of performance, say 10%, it's easier to accommodate performance
differences fairly.

Instead of the Sports Class we have in the US, I'd like to see something
like "Sports A" (handicaps from 1.05 and up), and "Sports B" (handicaps
from 1.04 and lower). Or maybe 3 classes?

--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New flying books from Germany ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 July 3rd 04 02:40 PM
New War publications ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 December 20th 03 01:47 PM
New Military Aviation Books from Germany ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 November 23rd 03 11:43 PM
New Military Aviation Books from Germany ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 October 29th 03 02:33 AM
New WWII books from Germany ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 October 13th 03 12:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.