![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Korves wrote:
After being around self launchers for many years, however, I mostly remember watching the owners fiddle with them, and then send the prop in for an AD, wait 3 months, then fiddle some more, and then send the engine in for an AD, wait another 3 months, and then fiddle some more. Was that a Stemme you were around? Well, maybe I am exaggerating at little. THey do require more maintenance than an unpowered sailplane because of the motor. Most of the time, it can be deferred to the winter or other times you can't fly anyway. The other side of the coin is an entire club shut down because of a towplane problem, which I've experienced more often than a problem with my motor. The other issue is that for the extra cost of the engine I could buy a Pawnee and have enough left over to hire a cute tow pilot on the interest it earned. Maybe a bit more exaggeration. IF you fly a lot (40+ flights a year), you can save more on tow and retrieve fees than the extra cost of interest, insurance, and maintenance. That's also an exaggeration, but not much. And the engine does hold it's value, so you can get your money back when you sell it. I suppose if you are antisocial or live in a part of the country where there are no tow planes, have time only during the week when the club is closed, or whatever, and have lots of money, and time for fiddling, then a self launcher would be dandy. It's also dandy for other purposes, and dandy even if most of those things aren't true. You quoted Steve Hill's posting, now you should read it more carefully! I happen to like the people in this sport at least as well as I like the flying. I sometimes actually enjoy waiting in a tow line telling war stories with my buddies. Nothing beats the Saturday night barbecue at the gliderport. Not that having a self launcher excludes you from any of this, of course. Another reason I don't seek self launchers is that I am not really good at complexity. I have enough trouble with the few levers and knobs is a pure glider. While learning to use flaps I did just about every dumb thing one can do with that single additional handle. A little voice in my head tells me that the complexity of a self launcher is not a good thing for me, personally. This is an excellent reason for sticking with unpowered gliders. Safely flying a motorglider does take more discipline and care than an unpowered glider. You are no longer just a glider pilot, but also the "tow" pilot. I think I am usually immune to peer pressure and my perceived standing in the gliding community. Somehow, though, after I completed a long and difficult flight in trying conditions, and somebody said "But you have an engine" -- I might have a problem with that! This used annoy me, but I don't hear it anymore. Pilots are much more aware of motorgliders now, so mostly, they ask thoughtful questions about how my flying differs, now that I have an engine. They can see I'm flying farther and in more interesting conditions than comparable gliders/pilots, yet I usually come back with a cold engine. It whets their curiosity. I am having a lot of fun with this post and I'm sure I have raised Eric Greenwell's blood pressure by now. I guess I need to tell the other side of the story. Last summer I met a pilot from Denmark, Francis, several times who was in the U.S. flying his DG-400 all around the western part of the country. And I mean all around. He started in Texas, worked his way up to Washington state, and was on his way back to Texas. He had done this sort of thing many times, in Europe, Morocco, etc. He does this every year. He lives out of a plastic grocery sack stuffed into the tiny luggage shelf of the glider. We took him to motels and to dinner since we had cars. This guy was living my daydream! And then there are the two Germans that flew their ASH 26 Es from Houston to Alaska, and back! Eric is also a pilot that really uses his self launcher well and often. He is a great guy, sociable, and fun to fly with. Why, thanks, Bob! I'm sure that there are many others out there, too. So a self launcher can be a wonderful thing. I would rather spend my meager gliding money buying more L/D with several wonderful partners in really nice ships than buying a stinky, noisy engine and propeller to fiddle with. If I won that lottery today, I don't think I would change what I am doing now. As always, YMMV. They aren't for everyone, but there are plenty of people that don't realize how much they would enjoy one, because they don't know very much about them and how they can improve their soaring experience. Generally, the $premium$ for the engine stops them thinking about the good things that make it worthwhile. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New flying books from Germany | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | July 3rd 04 02:40 PM |
New War publications | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | December 20th 03 01:47 PM |
New Military Aviation Books from Germany | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | November 23rd 03 11:43 PM |
New Military Aviation Books from Germany | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | October 29th 03 02:33 AM |
New WWII books from Germany | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | October 13th 03 12:54 AM |