![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm aware of one airplane/glider collision in the UK
not with 4 miles of the gliders base. A piston single cruising at about 140 knots ran into the back of a std cirrus on a staight glide. If I remeber correctlythe glider pilot was probably killed by the aircrafts propeller. I think the airplane pilot survived. I'm also aware of one in the UK and one in the USA where, although near the gliders base airports, both involved transiting powered airplanes - so not 'landing related'. In both cases the powered airplane removed the outboard few feet of the gliders wing. Both gliders landed safely, both airplane pilots were killed. Some years ago, as part of a discussion with officialdom about proposed increases in regulated airspace, I did a calculation that suggested that incidents that one might expect an airplane pilot to report as a near miss (which I reckoned was passing within 500 feet vertically and 300 yards horizontally of another aircraft and not seeing early enough to take avoiding action) would occur about 1000 times more often than actual collisions. At 20:30 25 November 2004, Mark James Boyd wrote: Peter Seddon wrote: 'Gliders in the U.K. were involved in 10 near-midairs The difference between a mid-air and a near-midair is certainly an interesting topic. While in contact with ATC in busy airspace I've frequently had jittery airline FOs call me as threatening traffic over a mile away. I'd guess if you're an airline guy and you see ANY aircraft, and it wasn't on your TCAS, you'd just automatically call it a near-midair. In the US, I'm not aware of any ACTUAL midair collisions between a glider and non-glider that are more than 4 miles from an airport. I know of lots and lots of talk about near-midairs, and significant pressure by the airlines to require transponders in more ways. Can we blame them? The FIRST mid-air could result in hundreds of deaths... So there hasn't been one yet, and it's very hard to tell how close we've REALLY been to having a glider-airplane midair that wasn't very near an airport traffic pattern or approach. I'm guessing this is trivial, and requiring transponders in gliders is a solution looking for a problem. Have there been any actual airplane-glider midairs in the UK that weren't takeoff/landing related (within 4 miles of the airport)? in the second half of last year, safety investigators said recently, noting that newer models fly at high altitudes without transponders and are hard to see, both visually and on radar....' http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ull.html#18860 0 e.g., Perhaps spam can pilots should look out of the window more often!! Another possibility is a radar reflector installed in the glider. These things are much cheaper than a transponder, and would give at least some info... I'd love to see if my local boating supply shop has one that would fit ![]() -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|