![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Rolley wrote:
In the USA there are simple and fatal flaws with any system that includes ground based radar and a controller near a high density airport. First, as already mentioned, the controller's normal display is processed information. The is often referred to as secondary radar. Basically it is just the transponder equipped traffic with data tags. Second, as already mentioned, the system is normally configured to drop out targets that have a low ground speed or don't have a ground track that is going somewhere (e.g. circling). So a radar reflector wouldn't be much help. It isn't the size of the return that gets the target filtered out under these circumstances. Third, and probably the greatest problem, if there are too many 12XX returns (VFR transponder equipped traffic in the USA) the controller can filter the specific codes or blocks of codes. These may be "simple" flaws, but they aren't "fatal" to transponder equipped gliders: #1 this isn't a problem for transponder equipped aircraft, since they will show on the display along with their data tag. Primary returns may not be displayed, depending on the situation; however, if you call ATC, they may be able and willing to put your primary return on the screen. #2 doesn't apply to transponder equipped aircraft, as they are not filtered by speed or track, but may apply to aircraft without transponders, as primary returns may be filtered by speed or track. Filtering out transponder #3 applies in only a very few, very high density areas that gliders aren't likely to be flying in, such as the area near LAX (Los Angles). The was a mid-air between a commuter flight and a skydiving jump plane between Denver CO and Cheyenne WY about 15 or 20 years ago. The commuter flew into the climbing jump plane. Since they we both above 12,500 MSL (about 7,000 AGL), it was assumed the commuter pilots were heads down in the cockpit. The jump plane was using a transponder code of 1234 and ATC had 12XX code filtered for the higher altitudes. The jump plane was not talking to ATC. Oops... Errors happen, and this has got to be a rare one, where both ATC and the jump plane make them. I've asked the controllers at Seattle Center if they ever filter out VFR code 1200 - "NO SIR"! The jump plane flying out of our airport gets every transponder equipped aircraft (including my glider) called out to him before he lets any jumpers loose. Other than a TCAS installation (aircraft to aircraft), This is actually the BEST reason to carry a transponder - so airliners in particular, but also many corporate aircraft and military aircraft can avoid you! the only way a transponder will help us is if the ATC facility in the area knows about the glider operations and can (or will) operate their equipment in a manner that allows the controller to see the glider traffic. That means we have to work with the local ATC folks. Otherwise, it is so much extra ballast and power draw in the glider. THis is definitely NOT true. ATC is operating their equipment so they can track VFR aircraft (that includes you in your glider), and they don't need to know if it's an airplane or a glider. If they can see the airplanes, they'll see you, even if you are circling or moving slowly. Even when the technology should help, local procedures can negate the technology. Since the way we operate gliders does not fit in the general transportation model the ATC system is designed to support, putting a transponder into a glider without working with the affected ATC organization does little to help the situation. The essence of the VFR 1200 code is that ATC _doesn't_ need to "work" with you: that's why it's a "VFR" code. You just fly around, minding your own business like the airplanes flying VFR, and their radar will pick you up. They want to know where the VFR traffic is so they can direct the IFR traffic away from it. Folks, we aren't that special. The only place in the USA that I know of that has a different situation is at Reno, where gliders may use the 0440 code to identify themselves as a glider. It's not required that gliders use it, only that they are allowed to use it as an aid to the Reno controllers. If you use 1200, they'll still see you. Note that it's not just the IFR and TCAS traffic that can be steered away from you, but also VFR aircraft using "flight following", and the already mentioned skydivers. If you think you need a transponder, but are concerned that it will be just "so much extra ballast and power draw", please, please, contact the ATC in your flying area and ask them if they will see you on their radar! My experience is they will be delighted to have you equipped with one. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|