A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sailplane Classes - a different perspective



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #24  
Old November 30th 04, 11:58 PM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
David Bingham wrote:
Hi Gang
For approximately 30 years the performance of gliders has hardly
advanced at all and yet we now have the tools (computer programs) and
much stronger materials (carbon composites) to surely advance the
state of the art of gliders. Has this happened? Yes there are marginal
improvements but so small. What's the reason for this slowdown in
innovation?


Not enough glider pilots. 625 thousand active pilots in the USA
(based on medicals applied for). Maybe 1 in 30 fly gliders.
Van's making a self-launch LSA glider would be a big help.

I recently was counseling a Park Ranger who flies a Husky
on patrol. She told me she wanted to improve her radio calls and
thought also that an IFR rating would help. I told her based on
the mountains she flies around, glider training would be much
more valuable. She was quite surprised.

If we get more glider pilots, we'll get enough mass to get the
innovations going. Turbine powered gliders, LSA transitions,
and the Sparrowhawks of the community are a good start...

I don't believe it has much to do with classes. There are a
lot of people on RAS that care, but of the 20,000 others,
most just get a glider they like...

I believe in no small part it is due to the sailplane
classes. With the establishing of the classes that are so rigid and,
in my mind, so restrictive, innovation has suffered. What a breath of
fresh air the SparrowHawk is! However there is no sailplane class for
it. So I got to thinking. Is the present setup of the classes
rational, reasonable? Could a better system be envisioned? OK, taking
this further if there were no classes today, and it was suggested to
set up classes, what would they look like? I think closer to what I'm
suggesting than what they are now. I hope my posting keeps the gang
thinking.

A couple of specific comments:

It is true Greg Cole required me to write him a check before demoing
the SparrowHawk but he also told me he would return the check if I
didn't like it.

Bob K wrote:
"So, if these classes were suddenly instituted tomorrow, would you
compete in them?"

A tough question. I just might participate in a class 1 competition
if were held close to home.
Dave



--

------------+
Mark J. Boyd
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ultralight sailplane aerotow liability Caracole Soaring 18 April 1st 04 09:17 PM
AL-12: New ultralight sailplane ISoar Soaring 4 March 24th 04 01:52 AM
Any sailplane pilots? Larry Dighera Soaring 99 January 7th 04 03:46 AM
An Historical Perspective on the Wright Accomplishment Gary Osoba Soaring 5 December 19th 03 12:35 AM
Electro-self-launching sailplane clement Soaring 5 September 12th 03 05:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.