|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#7
January 14th 05, 02:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On 14 Jan 2005 09:44:06 GMT, Andrew Warbrick
wrote: How? As stated in the report the Puch spins readily but recovers very easily. It is actually difficult for us to teach proper spin recover in the Puch simply because it recovers so easily. Considering the sheer number of spin accidents with instructors on board of Puchacz I dare to doubt that statement. The danger is that a pilot gets the impression 'all I have to do to recover is relax the back pressure' that'll kill you in a glider with genuinely nasty spin recovery characteristics like the DG500. DG500 nasty spin recovery characteristics? Which ones? I'm doing a lot of spin training in the DG-505 with 17.2m wingtips and the spin behaviour is really nice. Bye Andreas 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
| Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | April 29th 04 03:08 PM |
| Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Threaded Mode