![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(a) says someone without a commercial license can't be paid to be PIC
unless he falls under one of the exceptions, and (g) provides an exception for towpilots. So a towpilot without a commercial license can be paid. I don't see how it can be interpreted in any other way. BTIZ wrote: Pete.. read 61.113(a) again please... it says private pilots may not act as PIC nor be Compensated except as in b through g... so... para G exempts him from the PIC limitation, but not from the compensation. BT "Pete Brown" wrote in message ... 61.113 (a) lays out the general prohibitions against private pilots flying for compensation, subject to the exceptions laid out in paragraphs (b) through (g). Read the plain language for what it says. Towing is one of the exceptions to 61.113(a) which only discusses piloting for compensation. If a private pilot could not be paid for towing, there would be no need whatsoever for paragraph (g). It would be excluded by 61.113(a). FAA inspectors are bound by the language, not whether they agree with or like the regulation. Pete Brown BTIZ wrote: "T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message 1) The wording in § 61.113(g) is quite clear and allows a private pilot to tow for compensation. no it is not clear... and that is the issue... 61.113(a) says a private pilot cannot act as PIC nor receive compensation except as provided in (b) through (g) (b) through (f) cover various circumstances when a private pilot may share pro rata expenses, be reimbursed for cost, fly as PIC for charity events etc, and fly as "incidental" to a business, but it never says he can be paid to be a pilot. (g) says he can be PIC for towing, it does not say he can get paid to do it. Sooo... (a) says he cannot be PIC of an aircraft carrying passengers or cargo except for (g), and (g) says he can be PIC for towing, it does not say he can be compensated. I've heard these comments about Mr Lynch in the past, and if his information is so bad, then why does the FAA keep updating it on their official gov web page? -- Peter D. Brown http://home.gci.net/~pdb/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/akmtnsoaring/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. | Bush Air | Home Built | 0 | May 25th 04 06:18 AM |
FA: Huge collection of Private Pilot Books | mablacksv | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | April 1st 04 06:40 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future | Jack White | Military Aviation | 71 | September 21st 03 02:58 PM |