A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

US FAR 61.113 Private Pilots Towing gliders for compensation.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old January 20th 05, 04:39 AM
Greg Arnold
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(a) says someone without a commercial license can't be paid to be PIC
unless he falls under one of the exceptions, and (g) provides an
exception for towpilots. So a towpilot without a commercial license can
be paid.

I don't see how it can be interpreted in any other way.



BTIZ wrote:
Pete.. read 61.113(a) again please... it says private pilots may not act as
PIC nor be Compensated except as in b through g...

so... para G exempts him from the PIC limitation, but not from the
compensation.

BT

"Pete Brown" wrote in message
...

61.113 (a) lays out the general prohibitions against private pilots flying
for compensation, subject to the exceptions laid out in paragraphs (b)
through (g). Read the plain language for what it says. Towing is one of
the exceptions to 61.113(a) which only discusses piloting for
compensation.

If a private pilot could not be paid for towing, there would be no need
whatsoever for paragraph (g). It would be excluded by 61.113(a).

FAA inspectors are bound by the language, not whether they agree with or
like the regulation.

Pete Brown


BTIZ wrote:

"T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message


1) The wording in § 61.113(g) is quite clear and allows a
private pilot to tow for compensation.


no it is not clear... and that is the issue...

61.113(a) says a private pilot cannot act as PIC nor receive compensation
except as provided in (b) through (g)
(b) through (f) cover various circumstances when a private pilot may
share pro rata expenses, be reimbursed for cost, fly as PIC for charity
events etc, and fly as "incidental" to a business, but it never says he
can be paid to be a pilot.
(g) says he can be PIC for towing, it does not say he can get paid to do
it.

Sooo... (a) says he cannot be PIC of an aircraft carrying passengers or
cargo except for (g), and (g) says he can be PIC for towing, it does not
say he can be compensated.

I've heard these comments about Mr Lynch in the past, and if his
information is so bad, then why does the FAA keep updating it on their
official gov web page?



--

Peter D. Brown
http://home.gci.net/~pdb/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/akmtnsoaring/






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. Bush Air Home Built 0 May 25th 04 06:18 AM
FA: Huge collection of Private Pilot Books mablacksv Aviation Marketplace 0 April 1st 04 06:40 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future Jack White Military Aviation 71 September 21st 03 02:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.