A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

wing levelers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old February 25th 05, 06:16 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Montblack" wrote

Automotive world is using electronic stability-control (ESC) systems with
documented success.


I'm guessing some variant of this is what you'll eventually cobble

together
in your garage.


More than likely, they are using piezzo electric rate sensors for the
direction information. They are relatively cheap, and do well at sensing
rapid changes. They have been used for a while in the RC airplane world, as
a stability aid, with good success, also. Any really stable electronic gyro
system in the commercial auto-pilots world, are much more expensive, and as
far as I know, not available to the public.

Problem is, piezzo sensors have a fairly fast "drift." which makes the
leveling ability good only for a few seconds. If you handed over control to
one of these units, within 30 seconds, you would be upside down, and the
unit would think everything is still OK.

In the RC world, if the plane makes a sudden move to go upside down, it
senses the sudden move and if the sticks have not commanded the sudden move,
it will move the control surfaces to stay right side up. It counts on you
keeping it somewhat upright, and recalibrates itself often - based on your
MarkII eyeballs telling the plane to fly level.

Same thing with the car unit in the links. It knows that you are going
straight, or following curves. (still reasonably slow changes compared to
sudden loss of control) It continually reminds itself that it is going
straight, and re-sets itself. Only when a real sudden move is made, does it
correctly sense that it is not going straight and the steering wheel wants
the car to go straight. The computer then makes corrections to keep the car
straight.

If a plane wing leveler were based only on these units, and the plane
started banking very slowly, the sensor would not realize it. That is the
drift. It would re-set as level, then the plane banks another slow degree,
and the unit re-sets, and the plane banks...you get the picture.

I believe the concoction that had some success, was a GPS wingtip
differential altitude sensor. It used these rate sensors in unison to help
backup the control movements and make the controls smooth. The units
re-set using the GPS info as the reality of what was level. You have to use
something (MarkII eyeballs or GPS) doing this.

Good luck to the OP, figuring out a homemade wing leveler. It is a tough
problem.
--
Jim in NC


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ANG Woman Wing Commander Doesn't See Herself as Pioneer, By Master Sgt. Bob Haskell Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 March 18th 04 08:40 PM
Wing tip stalls mat Redsell Soaring 5 March 13th 04 05:07 PM
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping Wright1902Glider Home Built 0 September 29th 03 03:40 PM
Can someone explain wing loading? Frederick Wilson Home Built 4 September 10th 03 02:33 AM
An Affordable Homebrue 60 in DS machine Grant Soaring 0 August 8th 03 03:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.