![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Montblack" wrote Automotive world is using electronic stability-control (ESC) systems with documented success. I'm guessing some variant of this is what you'll eventually cobble together in your garage. More than likely, they are using piezzo electric rate sensors for the direction information. They are relatively cheap, and do well at sensing rapid changes. They have been used for a while in the RC airplane world, as a stability aid, with good success, also. Any really stable electronic gyro system in the commercial auto-pilots world, are much more expensive, and as far as I know, not available to the public. Problem is, piezzo sensors have a fairly fast "drift." which makes the leveling ability good only for a few seconds. If you handed over control to one of these units, within 30 seconds, you would be upside down, and the unit would think everything is still OK. In the RC world, if the plane makes a sudden move to go upside down, it senses the sudden move and if the sticks have not commanded the sudden move, it will move the control surfaces to stay right side up. It counts on you keeping it somewhat upright, and recalibrates itself often - based on your MarkII eyeballs telling the plane to fly level. Same thing with the car unit in the links. It knows that you are going straight, or following curves. (still reasonably slow changes compared to sudden loss of control) It continually reminds itself that it is going straight, and re-sets itself. Only when a real sudden move is made, does it correctly sense that it is not going straight and the steering wheel wants the car to go straight. The computer then makes corrections to keep the car straight. If a plane wing leveler were based only on these units, and the plane started banking very slowly, the sensor would not realize it. That is the drift. It would re-set as level, then the plane banks another slow degree, and the unit re-sets, and the plane banks...you get the picture. I believe the concoction that had some success, was a GPS wingtip differential altitude sensor. It used these rate sensors in unison to help backup the control movements and make the controls smooth. The units re-set using the GPS info as the reality of what was level. You have to use something (MarkII eyeballs or GPS) doing this. Good luck to the OP, figuring out a homemade wing leveler. It is a tough problem. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ANG Woman Wing Commander Doesn't See Herself as Pioneer, By Master Sgt. Bob Haskell | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 18th 04 08:40 PM |
Wing tip stalls | mat Redsell | Soaring | 5 | March 13th 04 05:07 PM |
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | September 29th 03 03:40 PM |
Can someone explain wing loading? | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 4 | September 10th 03 02:33 AM |
An Affordable Homebrue 60 in DS machine | Grant | Soaring | 0 | August 8th 03 03:52 AM |