![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 23:03:24 +1100, "smjmitchell"
wrote: One thing I really noticed is that nobody complained about the high taxes. All the civilians I met sort of didn't care that they were paying about 40% in income tax and another 10% imbedded in everything they bought as a federal sales tax. I care ..... it is a bloody rip off compared to the US and Europe ! That is the price we pay for the social wellfare system we run ... I was complaining about CASA when I got back here to my buddies at the FAA and they said that at one time there were 1400 CASA employees and only 700 airplanes in all of Australia. Interesting. Not true .... I don't know exactly how many airplanes we have here at the moment but my guess is that it is approx 15000 + all the ultralights and homebuilts that don't carry a state VH registration number. I almost missed all this. recent outages in my isp's news server were almost the death of BWB's post. a beautiful piece of imagery. the Stealth Pilot lives in Perth. the post regarding the lancair was based on 3 lost aircraft and 6 fatalaties. at one stage 30% of the australian lancairs had been lost during test flying or familiarisation flights by new owners. undoubtedly there are a few models of lancair mixed in there. one of our accident investigators with the atsb did a spreadsheet calculating aircraft losses by design and was stunned that the lancair sat on the top of the list with the highest statistic by far. the stats regarding casa are pretty well correct. they date from the late 70's when the department of civil aviation ran all the major airfields, all the air traffic control, the accident investigation and the regulatory side of things as one all encompassing entity. the stat was that casa (or whatever its name was then) employed THREE people per aircraft while the FAA employed 1 person per 15 aircraft. needless to say a lot has changed since then though Oshkosh still has more aircraft attending each year than on the australian VH register.(which excludes ultralights, gliders, weight shift and powered parachutes) the thing that we get right in australia is the absence of weapons. lots of us own guns and use them but we dont carry the things as a routine thing. if the guy you meet isnt going to shoot you then you will be more friendly and can have a more irreverent sense of humour. I see that you noticed the difference. the thing that we get wrong is that we dont pursue technology as much as we should. the stupid troglodytes (greens) have a grip on the place and stifle all innovation. our manufacturing has all been shipped to china because they are 5 - 10% cheaper and of course it is always easier to piggyback on a country as large as the USA than to get the finger out get on with life ourselves. btw as a W8 tailwind pilot myself I have no problems with lancairs as a design. if they were being given out I'd have one in a flash :-) Stealth Pilot ps the outback desert area is known in australian aviation as the GAFFA which translates as the great australian f**k all. 'cause there's f**k all out there but knee high scrub and rabbit burrows. it is GPS country for sure. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RV 6 in Sydney Australia | frank connaly | Home Built | 27 | May 22nd 04 10:02 PM |
Australia only Continental 0-200 or 0-240 | Robert | Home Built | 0 | May 20th 04 04:07 AM |
Rebuilding my KR-2 | Forrest | Home Built | 10 | December 9th 03 04:09 AM |
home built sites in Australia? | Chris Sinfield | Home Built | 1 | July 18th 03 04:05 PM |