A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Night flying in the mountians in a cessna 150,



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old February 26th 05, 10:39 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

1. The probability of experiencing an engine failure (or any other
improbable event for that matter) AT SOME POINT IN YOUR FLYING CAREER
goes up the more you fly. It goes up monotonically but nonlinearly
according to the formula 1-(1-P)^N, which asymptotically approaches 1 as
N gets large.


I have a feeling everyone in this discussion is talking past each other.
However, I'll still pick a nit (since after all, this is usenet).
Probability deals =only= with events whose outcome is not known or not
taken into account. If I take any random 10,000 hours, the probability
of some occurance (like an engine failure) is the same. Let's say the
probability over 10,000 hours is 70%. If I have =already= flown 9,999
hours without a failure, it is =not= true that my chance of failure on
the last hour is 70%. Likewise, if I have already flown those 9,999
hours and already had three engine failures, the chance of having
another in that last hour is =not= zero nor is it negative ("to make up
for the extra failures"). It is the same as the probability of a
failure on the =first= hour.

HOWEVER... the chance that, OVER THOSE 9,999 HOURS flown =plus= the one
not flown, I would =either have an engine failure shortly, =or= look
over my logbook and find that I already had one, would be the original
70%. The key here is including those flown hours without regard to
whether or not there was a failure there - iow as if we did not know the
result.

If you eliminate the hours flown because their outcome is known, then
you can only (correctly) apply probability to the unflown hours.

This is (of course) a different question from the one that says "Here's
my logbook. It has 10,000 one-hour flights in it. I had one engine
failure." and then, as one thumbs through the book saying "not this
one... not this one..." the chance of coming across a flight with an
engine failure =does= increase - because in this case an engine failure
is =guaranteed=. (it already happened).

Running out of fuel is not my idea of "engine failure".


If the fuel pump breaks and thus all four engines quit, did you have an
engine failure?

Jose
r.a.owning and r.a.student trimmed. I don't follow them.
--
Nothing is more powerful than a commercial interest.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Routine Aviation Career Guy Alcala Military Aviation 0 September 26th 04 12:33 AM
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? Cub Driver Military Aviation 106 May 12th 04 07:18 AM
Night Flying Tips BoDEAN Piloting 7 May 4th 04 03:22 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
Headlight for night flying Paul Tomblin Piloting 22 September 27th 03 09:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.