![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff,
The 'local' ATC station is responsible for airborne traffic and must provide 'standard' separation but ACTUAL avoidance is always the first responsibility of the pilot. They may give advisories and often do but it is only required when conditions permit. Once traffic has been pointed out to you and you acknowledge having the traffic in sight, ATC does not need to advise you ever again. Consequently, there are times when it is to your advantage not to tell ATC that you have the traffic. Happened to me once when ATC told me of a KC-10 on short final to a runway. I said I had it in sight. What I didn't know was that it was a touch-and-go and not a full-stop. A bit later it filled my windshield but ATC he don't say nothin'. Gene |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flight of two, IFR | Doug | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | January 13th 20 01:12 PM |
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality | Chip Jones | Piloting | 125 | October 15th 04 07:42 PM |
Tower Enroute Control? | Sam Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 2nd 04 02:31 AM |
New Oshkosh Tower | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 03 05:35 PM |
Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 02:33 AM |