![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Don Johnstone wrote: ... In most modern gliders the stick forces are very light, frightening so in something like a Discus. Some of the older gliders did get heavy at speed, for instance at 80kts the ailerons on a Sedbergh (Slingsby T21) are set in concrete requiring two hands or even four if available, not to mention the foot behind the stick to relieve the need for forward pressure on the stick. What is it that causes the difference between the two? -- FF |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hanger and gliders hit by storm. | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | February 1st 05 01:44 AM |
Powered gliders = powered aircraft for 91.205 | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 2 | December 12th 04 03:28 AM |
Production rates? | Ed Byars | Soaring | 38 | November 24th 04 04:13 PM |
Do you like gliders but hate FAA checkrides? | Bruce Hoult | Soaring | 8 | August 13th 04 05:14 PM |
Underwater Gliders | Burt Compton | Soaring | 6 | November 25th 03 04:43 AM |