![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Ron Wanttaja wrote: [snip] So...we have to burn our downward thrusters for four hours. "G" on the Moon is about 5.6 ft/Sec^2. We'd need to burn the same to counter that. Total acceleration required is 5.6 ft/sec^2 x 4 hours x 3600 seconds/hour... about 80,000 FPS, about sixteen times more than a ballistic S/C using a mass driver for launch, and, as a point of interest, almost three times what a spacecraft launch from the *Earth* needs. With the accel/decel Delta-V, our 870-pound spacecraft requires 24.9 *million* pounds of fuel. Doesn't the vehicle get lighter as fuel and oxidizer are consumed, requiring less thrust, lowering the consumption rate... Dan "and-so-on, and-so-on, and-so-on" Nafe danATscuba-trainingDOTnet |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
About the Global Flyer | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | January 11th 04 03:46 AM |
Call your local TV station, get Wright Flyer on the air | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 0 | December 17th 03 05:09 PM |
Wright Flyer won't fly! | Trent Moorehead | Piloting | 31 | October 18th 03 04:37 PM |
Wright Flyer | Dave Hyde | Home Built | 9 | September 29th 03 05:20 PM |
Arming Global Hawk Draws Conflicting Comments From Pentagon | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 5 | July 14th 03 08:51 PM |