![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Colin W Kingsbury" wrote)
snips clipped It seems to me that vectored-thrust aircraft face a couple of fundamental challenges that will not be easily overcome. First, you have the poor efficiency of turbines at low speed. The ducted fan approach will improve this somewhat but if you look at the V-22, it has HUGE propellers, more like mini chopper blades. The V-22 may be intended to spend more time in hover than a Mollermobile, but I'll side with the machine that's being flown seriously over the eternal prototype. Again, the V-22 is the best precedent we have to go on here, and the evidence is pretty bad. Twenty-some billion spent as I recall and the things are still nowhere close to deployment. The V-22 Osprey project drives me nuts. V-22 Billion!! (Semper Fi Congressional Industrial Complex) The 1950's Fairey Rotodyne worked. They even had orders. It was flying around Europe, hauling people and freight, in the late 50's and early 60's. This thing was designed over 50 years ago. Can you imagine new engines, new composites, new engineering concepts, new rotors, new electronics, etc? I don't know exactly what the design/mission specs are (were) for the V-22, but I suspect the Rotodyne came close to meeting some of them, while outdoing others. The Rotodyne was successfully flying. Tweak it, and you've got something. Start fresh and you have $22 BBBBillion worth of nothing. What a sad joke. Apparently, because of the way the jets on the rotor tips work, there is no need for a tail rotor. Also, the rotor goes into autogyro mode when the plane reaches a certain forward speed. The rotor-tip jets kick in for take-off and landing only. Jet thrust is provided by bleed air from the turboprop engines, located on the Rotodyne's stubby wings. Reason I've read for its demise was fear of noise pollution (Right, like a 1st generation 707 wasn't loud? And what about those 2 Harrier jump-jet at OSH last year?). Another reason I've read for the project's cancellation was British Govt. inside politics - with Fairey being outside. http://www.hofstra.edu/CampusL/Cultu...iro_movies.cfm Fairey Rotodyne movie on bottom of page http://www.dunnbypaul.net/aircraft/rotodyne/ Rotodyne info http://avia.russian.ee/vertigo/fairey_rotodyne-r.html Rotodyne page http://www.hofstra.edu/CampusL/Cultu...llery20_22.cfm X-game simulations are fun Montblack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Standard Cirrus Web Site Move | Jim Hendrix | Soaring | 0 | December 11th 04 03:11 PM |
most facile way to move heavy toolcase up/down stairs? | Alan Horowitz | Home Built | 28 | May 30th 04 09:39 AM |
Moller skycar still kicking | Harry K | Home Built | 16 | May 26th 04 05:16 PM |
Progress on Flying Car | Steve Dufour | General Aviation | 5 | December 19th 03 03:48 PM |
Airbus to move further into military AC inc Heavy Bombers | phil hunt | Military Aviation | 28 | November 24th 03 09:15 AM |